Tattoos on Pets: Fashionable or Freaky?

Published January 21, 2010

I could not believe my eyes when I ran across this rather perplexing news item the other day while I was on my daily rounds surfing the Internet looking for things of interest. And as I delved more deeply into the story, I sat in my chair shaking my head in bewilderment.

What in the world was this woman thinking when she decided to adorn her cat with a tattoo? How dare she? The hairs on the back of my neck actually stood up straight, in much the same way I imagine any cat's fur would when meeting up with Oksana Popova's beautiful Sphynx kitty, the hairless breed, named Mickey.

Now I don't want to start an international crisis here, but apparently in Russia, sadly it seems that cat tattooing is now all the rage. Some folks think it adds another aspect of beauty to their felines. Good grief, aren't cats just gorgeous just the way they are? Give me a break!

Popova made the decision to tattoo her cat in order to "celebrate the interesting times" which Russia now is undergoing. Feeling that the tattoo was both appropriate and befitting her cat, she said that she was quite delighted with the outcome. However I wonder how Mickey felt about this procedure which required him to be under anesthesia for three hours in order to acquire the tat of King Tut.

Of course animal rights activists are enraged with what they consider to be a brutal and senseless action. Outspoken in her dismay and disgust, Irina Novozhilova, an animal activist who lives in Moscow, stated that she thought the procedure was "barbaric and cruel". She added, "The ethical thinking about animals in Russia lacks behind that of the West. People in Russia mostly buy animals for selfish reasons and anything that happens to them afterwards is a consequence of that."

While identification tattoos, which are generally placed on the inner side of a cat's leg only requires shaving a small portion of fur and a very brief period of sedation, the more common practice today of embedding a small micro chip, a relatively painless procedure, is done by a veterinarian or a specially trained technician as these procedures are considered to be very useful in helping owners locate their lost pets.

The pro-tattoo folks in Russia claim that the "artful" tattoo is similar, and cannot understand why there is so much outrage about tattooing cats.

As far as I am concerned, Ms. Popova has gone beyond the poll in subjecting her lovely kitty to what I think borders on insanity and the height of egotistical behavior. But that is just my opinion, for what it is worth.

What do you think? Is all the upset over this tattooed kitty justified? Leave a comment and share your opinions.

Photo credit: Balkanpix.com; AP

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (22)

Anonymous (Unverified)

I want to get my pets tattooed for identification purposes. I want to put my email address (because it will never change) in their inter-ear along with a small symbol to help people remember them in the flyers if they ever get lost. Nothing outrageous though.

Tattoos are the best way for your pet to be identified. Collars and tags can get lost, while chips may never be scanned, On top of the problems with chips, they are not always picked up by scanners because there is no standard between manufacturers.

zeypher (Unverified)

re: bill bob

how would you like it if someone decided they wanted to put a tattoo on you? the key idea here is that we have a choice while animals do not.

re: everyone else if people can get this enraged about pets and tattoos, what about the masses of animals in the meat and dairy industry? they go through far worse and no one says a thing because it challenges the lifestyle they're used to and their morality.

Erika (Unverified)

Sick and Wrong.

Bill Bob (Unverified)

What's wrong with tattoos? I know tons of friends and family members who have them. You say its wrong for animals to get them... why? How so? Millions of humans tattoo themselves. Do you understand that? WE do it to OURSELVES. It's a safe, harmless procedure when done properly. What's wrong with it? The animals don't care whats on their skin and they don't feel much due to the anesthesia and pain meds. In fact, pets regularly get tattooed for identification purposes. Ya'll need to stop complaining about laws and animal cruelty and try to understand things from an objective perspective. You're not making any sense otherwise.

Chris

This is sick and WRONG! What next?

Laura Denvir (Unverified)

If they wanted tattoo's, they wouldn't need anaeshetic.

Beca (Unverified)

OK.. So instead of just tattooing themselfs ( i have to mind you ) They have to go and start inking pets. Wtf.. If there is not enough skin on humans to ink then STOP!