Idaho State University Ends Use of Dogs in Medical Training
On November 7, Idaho State University announced the Advanced Trauma Life Support class will no longer use or kill dogs from a local shelter in their training. They will substitute live animal using non-animal based instruction which is presently used widely by other institutions across the country.
Only two days after The Physicians committee for Responsible Medicine filed a complaint with the federal government (U.S. Department of Agriculture) on November 5, concerning the use of live animals in the ISU training course held in the Pocatello campus, ISU issued the change in training methods.
Highlighting that ISU's methods of training violated the federal Animal Welfare Act, the story about the PCRM's fling their complaint was quickly picked up by the media, resulting in an outpouring of requests by animal lovers, to ISU demanding the school stop using live animals in their training course.
Shelter dogs will no longer be killed for medical research
Dr. John Pippin of PCRM called a local Idaho TV station saying, "It's especially inhumane and especially indefensible when there are alternatives in hand which not only would spare the animals the trauma of going through this but also would provide a better educational experience."
Only a handful of schools that provide Advanced Trauma Life Support training continue to use live animals in their course. Thankfully is now ISU is joining the 90% of ATLS courses which are taught around the country using only human-based simulators.
Shocking information discovered from documents obtained by PCRM through Idaho's Public Records revealed that the Animal Shelter in Pocatello was actually turning over lost or surrendered pets "including a black-and white border collie picked up when he was still trailing his blue leash" to ISU for their training classes. In the recent report, it was revealed that ISU faculty used shock collars to prevent dogs from barking. Dogs that were transported to ISU were often subjected to unnecessary stress and pain during the transition from the shelter to the school.
The Idaho Humane Society was strongly opposed to the use of these dogs for the trauma class. In a statement, IHS executive director, Jeff Rosenthal told a Boise, Idaho TV station, "The people relinquishing their animals to the shelters—and these were either stray animals and some of them were owned animals—did not know that the animal would end up being utilized for medical training, and I think that's part of the problem here."
The PCRM's complaint cites an ongoing 2007-2008 survey which they conducted with facilities throughout the country that offer ATLS training. They have so far received responses from 193 U.S. and Canadian Institutions revealing that 176 of those facilities exclusively use non-animals models for their training which exclusively use the TraumaMan System. ISU Boise campus is one of those facilities. ISU announced that their Pocatello class will immediately start using non animal resources for instruction.
You can learn more about the PCRM campaign to abolish the use of live animals in trauma training classes by visiting http://www.pcrm.org/resch/atls/index.html
Do you think that ISU’s decision to stop using live animals in their training course has further reaching implications in the use of live animals in research? Please share your opinions by leaving a comment.
Recent Posts
Friday the 13th: Unlucky or a Fortunate Event?
Naming a Cat: A Serious Undertaking
Cats and Water: Are they really enemies?
WEEKLY CUDDLE CHAMPION: Bella the Bulldog Puppy
November is National Pet Diabetes Prevention Month
A Three Cat Law: Is This Fair?
Blind Woman Wins Legal Battle Over of Service Dog
Sanity Claws May Arrive a Bit Earlier In California
WEEKLY CUDDLE CHAMPIONS: Biggie and Louie
Baby Cheetah Adopted by World's Fastest Man
Petside: Get Started
-
- Find a Breed
Browse dog and cat breeds to find your perfect pal.
-
- Diagnose a Condition
Use PetVet to research what's ailing your pet.
-
- Locate a Hospital
- Find the nearest accredited animal hospital.
-
- Puppy Life
Register with Puppy Life to get the most for your puppy.
Specials
Check out these deals picked by petside.com just for you!
Comments (3)
Hide Posted Comments
lj % November 15, 2008 7:58 AM
I am opposed to using a dog for any type of experimentation. It is cruel and horrific for the animals. This is especially deplorable if there are in fact alternative methods for testing!
lj (jock4hire)
Vicki November 15, 2008 10:03 AM
I am glad they are no longer using these animals for research. There are other methods for research other than using these animals. Glad they finally figured that out.
JAN November 16, 2008 12:21 PM
I AM A VEGETARIAN! I SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING WE ARE USING ANIMALS FOR FOOD - TOTALLY UNNECESSARY THERE ARE LOTS OF GOOD THINGS TO EAT BESIDES MEAT. I HAVE SEEN THE BRUTAL VIDEO OF WHAT HAPPENS TO THE ANIMALS, AND I REALLY BELIEVE THAT SOMEONE IS GOING TO FACE GOD, AND BE PUNISHED SEVERELY FOR THEIR ACTIONS, BECAUSE THEY ARE VERY, VERY NASTY. I APPLAUD CALIFORNIA FOR BRINGING PROP 2 INTO LAW SO BEFORE THE ANIMALS ARE KILLED THEY CAN FEEL SUNSHINE, GRASS AND BE ABLE TO WANTER IN THE PASTURE. "A NATION IS ONLY AS GREAT AS THE WAY IT TREATS IT'S ANIMALS." AND WE ARE FAILING MISERABLY. THANK YOU ISU FOR SEEING THE LIGHT, AND STOPING THE SUFFERING OF COUNTLESS ANIMALS IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE.