Widow of the Man Responsible for Animals Killed in Ohio Tragedy Wants Animals Back

Published October 28, 2011

Flickr User Phil Romans

The widow of the man responsible for the animals killed in the Ohio tragedy last week reportedly wants her animals back.

According to an article in the online Mansfield Journal, the widow of the man responsible for the 49 animals killed in Ohio last week reportedly wants her animals returned to her.

When I first learned of the tragic events on Terry Thompson’s Ohio wildlife preserve last week, my initial reactions were deep sorrow over the loss of the innocent exotic wild animals (some of which are endangered species) and anger toward the people keeping them as pets.  

But I was absolutely livid the other day upon receiving an email from one of my readers informing me that Terry Thompson’s widow, Marian Thompson, is trying valiantly to have the six surviving animals presently being kept at the Columbus Zoo (three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys) returned to her. I thought, “How could anyone that completely comprehends the special care these animals need even consider giving them back to her?"

While I cannot in any way condone keeping these animals as pets, for a moment (simply as another passionate animal lover) I found it difficult not to put myself in Marian’s shoes. Not only has Marian just lost her husband, but she's also lost the animals she (reportedly) profoundly adored.

When Jack Hanna, Columbus Zoo director emeritus, met with Thompson and Muskingum County Sheriff Matt Lutz to load the surviving animals for transport to the zoo, Thompson begged them not to take the animals away.

"She truly loves those animals, and this is devastating for her," Hanna said. "She just lost her husband and now she's lost the only family she has. It’s tragic.”

In spite of her overwhelming sorrow, Marian (who was out of town on business when the tragedy unfurled) cooperated with attending officials, helping them to load the animals into their crates.

"She's completely cooperated with the sheriff's office and zoo and wants what is best for her animals," Marian's attorney Dean Wilson commented. "Like Hanna said, these were her children."

To be sure, I am walking that very fine line between compassion for Marian and indignation about what was described as the deplorable conditions under which most of these animals were kept. This tragic event speaks loudly against keeping exotic wild animals, whose behavior is unpredictable, as pets. Doing so can only lead to unspeakable heartache for their owners and disaster for the animals.

Do you think the surviving animals should be returned to their owner? Share your opinions in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (10)

jmuhj (Unverified)

If she truly "loves" them, as she claims, she will do what is best for THEM and relinquish her claim to them immediately. It's not their fault, nor is it our fault, that her husband did what he did, either by collecting these nondomestic animals and keeping them in squalor, or in committing suicide. I have no sympathy whatsoever for her. My feelings are entirely with the survivors of the bloodbath perpetrated by Ohio law enforcement and occasioned by their "keeper's" unconscionable actions.

fourhorsegal

I do not believe they should be returned to her. I am sure that she loves the animals, but exotic animals need a place where they can be cared for properly. I think they are in a much better place than she can provide for them.

Reno (Unverified)

No, I do not beleive that they should be returned to her. I don't deny that she loves those animals. I am sure that she does. But the conditions in which they were living make it very clear that she either could not or would not provide the care neccessary for their well being. Purrhaps she truly doesn't know what these animals require in the way of care, but ignorance is no excuse. If you don't know how to care for an animal then you should not have it. Just like if you don't care about how to take care of an animal.....