Washington D.C. Kitten Declawer Finally Sentenced

But does the punishment fit the crime?

Published February 26, 2013

Washington Humane Society

DC Man who declawed kittens at home is sentenced to 180 days in jail

Last May, in one of the most gruesome acts of cruelty to animals, 39 year-old South Washington, DC resident Eric Felipe Gaskins took it upon himself to rip out the claws of his daughter's two eight-week old kittens at his home in order to preserve his furniture. Gaskins was arrested in September 2013 and charged with two counts of felony animal cruelty. If he was found guilty he faced a sentence of up to five years in prison and a $25,000 fine. 

Gaskins pled guilty to two felony animal cruelty charges in the District of Columbia Superior Court last November. His sentencing was scheduled for February 1, 2013.  However, the sentencing was delayed since Gaskins and his attorney requested more time to review the prosecutor’s report that contained the kittens’ veterinary medical records and sentencing recommendations.

Due to the severity of the kittens’ injuries, which veterinarians determined to be untreatable, they had no choice but to euthanize them humanely

On Friday, February 22, according to NBC Washington, Gaskins once again made a court appearance. Superior Court Judge Patricia Broderick sentenced Gaskins to 180 days in a half-way house, three years of supervised probation, and a $100 fine to go the Victims of Violent Crimes Fund. Upon his release he must complete 40 hours of Community Service. Additionally Gaskins will undergo a mental health assessment, attend a parenting skills group, and will not be allowed to own any pets for the duration of his probation period.

Investigators of the case from the Washington Humane Society’s Law Enforcement Department expressed mixed emotions about the sentence passed on Gaskins by Judge Broderick, noting that Judge Broderick had chosen not to follow the recommendation of a 360 day jail term made by the prosecutor.

Vice President of Officer Scott Giacoppo, the External Affairs and Chief Programs Officer said, “This remains one of the worst cases of animal cruelty I have ever encountered in my more than 20 years in animal welfare. We are pleased to have justice for Simba and Pumba; however, we are disappointed that the judge chose to disregard the prosecution’s recommendation for the maximum punishment allowable for this heinous act.”

This writer is highly disappointed with what I consider Judge Broderick’s “slap on the wrist” sentence for a horrendous act of cruelty to animals. It makes me wonder if and when crimes of this nature will be taken seriously enough to render sentences that truly “fit the crime”. Additionally what about Gaskins’ daughter’s emotional wounds that this cruelty created?  Are they beyond healing?

What is your reaction to Judge Broderick’s sentence? Tell us in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (21)

lisa niebur (Unverified)
ABSURDLY LIGHT SENTENCE FOR TORTURE!
Anonymous (Unverified)
Have the same done to the judge, this guy should not be in jail, he should also have the same done to him,,,without any anaesthetic, or any kind of bandages, before and after,,,just let him suffer,,,crimes of this sort never seem to get punished to the maximum, i know in my case, when i hear of a crime against an animal i take the law into my own hands because there is no such thing as the judicial system punishing to the maximum, i got sick and tired of said criminals 'walking away with a slap onthe wrist' and decided to do something about, and yes, it feels very very good.
Anonymous (Unverified)
but the rapists in Steubenville only got 2 years.
Anonymous (Unverified)
Someone should pull the judges fingernails and toenails off and see what he thinks about that.Maybe then the sentence would be a little different
Florence (Unverified)
They may be small and cute but a is hard work. They need to be groomed daily, as their fur gets teglnad very easily take it from me, I have one. Also, the require a lot of attention and do not like being locked up on their own. They like to be involved with everything, and are intelligent inquisitive dogs. They also need interaction with other poms/dogs because they tend to think they are humans! I would consider getting 2 boys. But females do have a nice temperament.References :
Anonymous (Unverified)
You morons need to pull your heads out of your as*s. This man got the proper sentence. While a horrible thing to do, the sentence fit the crime. This guy did this because he was stupid and a cheapskate who didn't want to spend the money to get a vet to do the declawing. Maximum sentences are for people who have habitually committed the types of crimes they are being tried for. This idiot clearly did not, he was just stupid. As for his daughter being scarred and damaged by this. Doubtful, she'd likely have been far more damaged losing her parent to prison for several years.
Anonymous (Unverified)
PULL HE'S NAILS OUT!