United Airlines Bans Dog Breeds

Published March 13, 2012

American Staffordshire Terrier: Getty Images

United Airlines announced that nine different dog breeds will no longer be permitted to fly on their aircrafts.

When Jessie Huart recently attempted to book a flight on United Airlines in order to travel with Slaw, her ten year-old Pit Bull, she was told that because Slaw was a Pit Bull, he would not be permitted on the flight.

If you have a Pit Bull terrier, an American Staffordshire terrier, or any other canine deemed to be a “dangerous" breed, the “friendly” skies of United Airlines is no longer living up to it's famous motto.

Following its merger with Continental Airlines last week, United Airlines adopted Continental’s discriminatory pet policies and announced that nine different dog breeds will no longer be permitted to fly on their airplanes:

  • Pit Bull Terriers
  • American Staffordshire Terriers
  • Presa Canario
  • Perro de Presa Canario
  • Dogo Argentino
  • Cane Corso
  • Fila Brasileiro
  • Tosa (or Tosa Ken)
  • Ca de Bou

The carrier is the only United States airline that prohibits certain breeds based simply on their reputation for being “dangerous."

United Airline's PetSafe program enforces a Dangerous Dog Breed Restriction based only on the appearance and the breed, but not the behavior of these dogs.

While the National Animal Control Association, the Humane Society of the United States and The American Veterinary Medical Association maintain that a dog's physical appearance is not a good predictor of aggressive behavior, and these kinds of restrictive and discriminatory policies are opposed by every major dog-related organization, the United Airlines ban remains in force.

Not only do policies like this one prevent responsible owners of these breeds from flying with their dogs, it serves to promulgate the popular myths and misunderstandings about these canines.

These misconceptions have lead to the needless death of thousands of dogs which fall into the “dangerous” category.

This writer feels that this arbitrary policy concerning specific breeds is both prejudicial and unfair profiling. Are all Pit Bulls vicious?  Are all Akitas dangerous? 

Most dog lovers will agree that without good training any breed can fall into the “dangerous” category.

Since all pets, when frightened, can react aggressively, will the next “logical” step be to ban all dogs from flying with their owners?  Isn’t it more appropriate to judge a dog as an individual based on its personality and temperament?

But since United Airlines is listening closely to customer feedback during its adjustment to their recent merger, if you disagree with the present canine policy you can help. 

You can join thousands of folks who have signed Huart's change.org petition requesting United Airlines to drop their breed-discriminatory policy and restore their dog- friendly skies.

What do you think about United Airline’s new canine policy? Tell us with a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (19)

Anonymous (Unverified)
I have several friends that raise pit bulls and have seen them train their dogs and these dogs are the best dogs the get along with babies and other adults,with no problems.I have even babysat these dogs and never been bit at all. This ban is so stupid.
Anne
Just another reason to NOT fly the "unfriendly" skies of United. Breed specific rules do not prevent injuries or bites since any animal with teeth can bite,especially when stressed. I believe that many of the airlines are trying to put an end to transporting pets completely. Being charged as much as $150 each way to bring my 15 lb. dog on to fit under the seat with no other carry on allowed so I have to pay to check my luggage has kept me from travel by public transport for more than 3 years.
Anonymous (Unverified)
You cant do that, it would be unconstitutional as every person has a right to leave there country. That's why some people want Obama impeached for the "No Fly List" because its the act of a dictator. Something you would expect to see in a communist/socialist society.
Anonymous (Unverified)
They forgot chihuahuas and dachshunds! Those two breed rack up the highest number of bites per breed... so why aren't they on the list? Oh, that's right! It was once again ignorant people making decisions about something they knew nothing about! Ugh!
Anonymous (Unverified)
Because chihuahuas and dachshunds may bite but pit bulls kill! Big difference!
Flyer (Unverified)
The plural of "aircraft" is "aircraft".
Anonymous (Unverified)
I say boycott United and Continental. Breed discrimination is racism in humans. To quote Cesar Milan. "You can't say 'I like dogs, but I don't like this dog.'" Having said that I would NEVER allow an animal of mine to fly cargo, anyway .