The Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation Fails Its Horses

Published March 21, 2011
Most of my friends know I am absolutely passionate about horses. Ever since I was a little girl, these magnificent animals captured my heart. And even though I lived in New York City, I spent endless hours hanging out at the local riding academy, cleaning stalls, grooming and feeding horses in exchange for riding lessons. Even though I am not an avid horse racing fan, when Barbaro, the beloved thoroughbred who won the Kentucky Derby in 2006, was fatally injured during the Preakness Stakes, I became involved with folks working tirelessly to abolish horse slaughter and networking to rescue horses in need. So the other day, I was shocked to read the "New York Times" featured article on the front page about The Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation of Saratoga Springs, N.Y. Founded in 1984, its mission is to save horses no longer able to compete on the racetrack from possible neglect, abuse and slaughter. It is one of the largest and most respected racehorse charities in the world. And even though T.R.F has received millions of dollars from some of the most famous people in the racing industry, according to inspection reports and interviews, the organization has repeatedly failed to pay for the upkeep of the thousand horses it oversees. Sadly, this failure to support the retired racehorses under their care has caused the starvation and death of many of these animals who, at one time, were magnificent. After caretakers expressed concern for these horses, the Paul Mellon estate, one of the foundation's biggest donors, asked Dr. Stacey Huntington, a veterinarian from Springfield, Mo., to check out the foundation's herd. She discovered many cases of neglect due to a lack of support by T.R.F On the 25 farms that T.R.F contracts to foster the horses, investigations revealed that many of the horses were in "poor" or "emaciated" condition, with some even having died of starvation. A quarter of the horses were in need of urgent veterinary care. In response to these allegations George Grayson, the foundation's president said, "We have dug ourselves a big hole financially, and we're still behind. It's been a struggle to keep up with the costs associated with a large and aging horse population, at a time when the economy and giving is down. Everybody on the board takes any allegation seriously and anything less than positive circumstances for the horses are unacceptable. When we've been made aware of issues, we have responded quickly, and we will on this." But what I can't come to grips with is how T.R.F. could have been so "in the dark" about the deplorable conditions in which the horses under their "care" were living. Is this possible? What do you think? Share your thoughts in a comment. Image Source: Flickr user Evil Genius Society: Share the world
Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (9)

Robin Hurst (Unverified)
Robin " But this foundation had an impeccable reputation until the NYT smeared them maybe a bit prematurely. I believe TRF should be given the benefit of Drape's doubts. He's jumped the gun too fast in the past. Lets try to help the TRF in their work to give these horses the care" Using TRF's "impeccable reputation" as a defense that therefore "nothing is wrong" is the exact reason why it took us so long to call attention to this situation. Well over a year ago, a collective effort of gathering facts and documenting those facts began, as a result of horses from the Circle E (Gayle Englande's farm) and Out2Pasture (Robin Hurst's farm) being moved to other, lower per diem farms. My concern at that time was not about the money TRF owed us, but rather, that they were going to move my horses to strictly turnout facilities-I knew the horses residing on our farm would not be able to survive in those situations. I would like to clarify here: my definition of special needs pretty much includes all OTTBs-bc in my experience (albeit limited compared to others) OTTBs need extra groceries (high quality alfalfa, grain) and shelter (a basic need NOT provided by some of the satellite farms). The TRF horses residing on our farm are not cripples-they all have had intake exams and are provided preventative health care measures-typically on our dime-I knew they would not have such care on these other farms. We followed the appropriate protocol of contact regarding alerting the TRF board of our concerns--numerous times--then nothing was addressed by the board, it was at that time that we reached out to two of the largest animal welfare groups for help-they did not take our concerns seriously either-using the same argument of TRF's "impeccable reputation".
Gayle
It would seem to me that the NY AG will do a very independent review of the TRF. However I would like to clarify this story since I'm the one on the cover of the NYTimes with the 2 horses and own Circle E Ranch. This problem of the farms not being paid, no wormer or vaccine for the horses has been going on si April 08. When I finally refused to lower my per diem from $5.00 a day to $3.00 a day at our special care farm I was threatened that my horses would be moved to farms that were on the cheap. However, the special horses I had came to me from the cheap providers and could not survive in that environment. Thus a vicious circle. TRF moved my herd, sent them to 2 different farms and it's my understanding 2 of my horses died within 8 months. There had been enough complaints from 11/09 through 12/10 that went ignored by TRF that the Mellon Trustees hired an independent vet to conduct the evaluations. I would opine that the information being provided by the vet Dr. Huntington wasn't what TRF wanted to hear so that fired her and the Mellon estate pulled its money from TRF only after spending approx. $50,000. on emergency care, food to the farms and medicine as well as paying for the evaluations. To go back, when the trustees embarked on their quest to help the horses, there were so many emaciated and starving horses that the trustees called me to see if the Circle E Ranch would open their hearts as well as their ranch to the TRF horses once again so they had a special care farm to send the sick and starving ones to. We discussed it among ourselves that night and agreed to do the job. I have intake pictures of these 14 horses alone that came to our ranch and also you should note that one was so bad that I couldn't bring him aroung and he had to be euthanized on Feb 11, 2011. They were placed on my ranch on 1/24/11 in emaciated condition and starved. One should note that when you get into the little knitpicking of starved or thin, it only takes one day to go from thin to starved. People need to get it...that means no food. No oversight...no help from TRF to the farms. The farms were sent the horses, contracted with them for payment, and then left to care for the horses basic needs on their own dime. The farms were left high and dry with no money to feed the horses. In closing, they talk about staff of TRF taking a cut in pay, etc. I'd like to know how many of them went without their morning starbucks or food in their stomach because there was no money to buy food. How many went without a paycheck for months on end like the farms did and couldn't provide food for the horses. How many staff went without medicine when they needed it like the horses went without innoculations for 2 years and the same goes for wormer. These are the questions I'd like answers to. People talk about TRF is the biggest rescue in the world. Well, that doesn't mean anything when you can't take care of you inventory and in this case that's the horses. Additionally it should be noted that there are alot of wonderful smaller rescues that so a great job, pay their bills and work together with other rescues to acheive the same goal that TRF was suppose to meet. In my opinion there is no excuse that this problem was ignored by the entire board when I have copies of emails and letter showing the information of "lack of basic care causing the horses to be at risk" were all sent from 11/09 thru 12/10. Joe Drape wrote every word of truth in hopes of championing for the horses and I'd say he did a wonderful job. Finally, it's gotten someones attention!
Diana
Personally, I would not line a birdcage with the New York Times. While it used to be a respected newspaper, it's standards have dropped woefully and it prefers to pursue it's own political agenda rather than the truth. It's journalistic standards are nonexistent. That said, the allegations need to be researched by an independent organization (is there a truly independent organization anywhere anymore?) and if fraud or problems are found, they need to be addressed. If funds are sorely lacking, then perhaps the TRF needs to limit the scope of their very worthwhile endeavors.
Helena (Unverified)
"Obviously, there is some form of fraud going on here. The organization needs a full audit and probably completely new management."
jmuhj (Unverified)
I understand all too well about financial issues, and it appears this organization was founded with the most altruistic principles. It's a tragic and, to me, unforgivable fact that many sanctuaries are going under due to our global financial crisis. The answer? I honestly do not know. While the uber-wealthy continue to steal from the rest of us and get away with it, and we have now not one, but THREE idiotic wars going, I don't have a lot of hope; but what hope I do have is for compassionate and responsible caregiving for all of the blameless and vulnerable all over the world -- whatever species they may be.
Jo Singer (Unverified)
Thanks Tj for the other side of the story. I do hope that more information is forthcoming which will bring light to what the NYT's article may indeed have neglected to add to the picture.
lj (Unverified)
Kinda wondering if Pro slaughter folks might have stirred this particular pot up! What a great way to distract our ultimate goals to end slaughter. It sounds like it could have been orchestrated by team Duquette/Wallis, who want us all to fail in our efforts to keep slaughter out of America. Things are gettin' pretty hot and not just in Japan! We've got some really driven people that wish to control the market like they've been doing for many years. The U.S. is all about the money or the powers that be are sure bent on all that dirty paper. We'd better be turning to our values and not focus on the value. We need to look into our own communities and find we all can help each other if we really want too! But I don't want us to just take the word of one journalist who'd not done nearly the investigative reporting he should've, and take the word of who? There's lots unanswered in this little smear campaign against the TRF, but I can't believe they've let it all get so far gone. No there's more evil at work. And the pictures don't show any emaciated or starving animals. Not that I'd seen and I know first hand what they look like when they're starving. Nope I aint buying the NYT article on the one article. TRF wouldn't have been so forthright if these animals were in such incapable hands. NO WAY!! There's a lot one could imagine about this, but the foundation isn't starving and neglecting their retired Thoroughbreds. I don't believe it. You were right to put it out here Jo, cause if it'd been the facts all the way round,..... it'd be devastating to so many people who've been sponsoring and putting in funds for so many horses. 1200 animals are a whole lot. Earle Mack is pretty straight and honest guy, I don't believe he'd stand behind TRF if they weren't doing their best in this work they do. Many of their retirees are very old now too. TB's don't live as long as grade types usually. But I hope this is dispelled quickly without a lot of speculation. They're looking into all of this as we chat here today. Don't doubt that. sorry to be gone so long Jo. Been battling my back injury for the last few months as I was reinjured right after X-mas. Hope I'm gonna get back 100%. Smiles, lj