Three-Year Ban on Pets for Sale in Pet Stores Proposed in Los Angeles

Los Angeles could possibly ban the sales of kitten and puppy mill animals in pet stores for three years. Read more below!

Published October 10, 2012

Flickr User PMDBDigitalFoto

This month the Los Angeles City Council could be hearing a proposal that effectively bans the sale of commercially bred cats, dogs and rabbits for three years in retail pet stores in the city. Read more below!

Remember Patti Page’s 1952 smash hit “How Much is that Doggie in the Window?” With its huge popularity and “fetching” sentiment, it reached #1 on the Billboard and Cash Box charts. With a ban on selling pets in LA pet stores already in place since 2010 in California’s West Hollywood and South Lake Tahoe, along with other municipalities across the country considering instituting a similar ban, the glorification of pet store puppies expressed in this one-time red-hot hit seems today to have turned quite chilly.

According to an item on LA WEEKLY Blogs,  the Los Angeles City Council could be hearing a proposal this month introduced by Councilman Paul Koretz, chairman of the Personnel and Animal Welfare Committee, effectively banning the sales of commercially bred cats, dogs and rabbits for three years in retail pet stores in the city. The ordinance would, however, permit the sale of pets obtained from shelters and non-profit rescue groups that are registered with the city’s Department of Animal Services.

The proposed ordinance’s goal is reducing the overcrowding and wanton euthanasia of surrendered or discarded pets languishing in city animal shelters. Koretz’s ultimate aspiration is turning all Los Angeles animal shelters into no-kill facilities. In commenting on the proposed ban, Koretz said, "That's going to take a tremendous amount of work and many steps. This is just one step in that direction."

Additionally, city administrators envision that the demand for commercially bred baby animals in kitten and puppy mills will be drastically reduced. Due to the information disseminated by animal activist groups concerning the inhumane and filthy conditions existing in these pet “factories” (where baby animals are churned out non-stop just to make a hefty profit), officials are hopeful that potential pet owners will adopt from local shelters rather than visit pet stores.

Animal activists claim that if the ordinance passes, other municipalities will follow suit since Los Angeles leads the way in many other humane animal-related issues.

On the other hand, according to the Contra Costa Times, those involved in the pet industry call the proposed ban a “witch hunt” that will result in financial ruin for owners of ethical pet stores.

Michael Canning, the President of the Washington, D.C.-based Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council, strongly disagrees with the ban since it would effectively close 11 local pet stores and put more than 60 people out of work.

Canning said, “Anybody that would engage in substandard breeding already doesn't follow the rules. This will just drive people to sell their puppies on the Internet or some other unregulated way like the flea markets or out of their trunks on the street."  He added that no studies have been made that demonstrate that anyone wanting a purebred puppy would seek one from a shelter if they were not available for sale at pet stores.

Do you think that pet stores should be banned from or allowed to continue selling kittens, puppies and rabbits? On which side of the issue do you stand?  Share your views in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (17)

Joan (Unverified)
A better option than not allowing the sale of pets in pet stores is allowing them to showcase pets that are up for adoption. They can certainly still be a draw for customers and those folks coming in to purchase pet food etc. It is a win win for all and most of all the pet. :)
Anonymous (Unverified)
Pet stores DO NOT need to sell animals for profit! There are PLENTY of other needed items to sell!!!! It is HEARTBREAKING to know that MILLIONS of healthy, adoptable pets are put to death, simply because shelters have run out of room for them. It happens more often than one would like to imagine. PLEASE pass this ordinance! PLEASE make Los Angeles a NO KILL CITY!!!!
Rosina (Unverified)
I believe the pet shops should be able to buy dogs, cats from individuals or even be given to them free versus them being taken to animal clinics. This would lessen the puppy mills but would be great if used in conjunction with animal shelters. More exposure for them to find homes.
Peanutbutter (Unverified)
Maybe a step in the right direction..????? However, why doesn't our "DO NOTHING CONGRESS" step up to the plate and pass legislation BANNING ALL PUPPY MILLS with stiff penalties...perhaps jail time.....for those who won't comply because they'll lose their income!! How can a person sleep at night knowing how THIS income is made???
Anonymous (Unverified)
study it further
Anonymous (Unverified)
This is a good start - every proposal always has flaws that need to be worked through but you need to start somewhere. People who buy these animals and then drop them off should be discarded as well.
Anonymous (Unverified)
What breed of dog is in the picture??? Beautiful