Op-Ed: Why the Mitt Romney Dog on Roof Story Won't Go Away

Published April 18, 2012

Getty Images

The Mitt Romney dog on roof story and the recent revelations that Barack Obama had eaten dog before are likely to stay.

The dog-eat-dog nature of the presidential election season just became literal, when conservatives unearthed an excerpt from Barack Obama’s memoir which admitted Obama had eaten dog before. The excerpt, revealed in a conservative blog, was a response to a constant attack from the left for the infamous “Mitt Romney dog on roof” incident, in which Romney strapped his family pup Seamus to the roof of his car for a 12-hour trip to Canada. The two decade old story had drawn ire for Romney from the left for a while, including most recently due to Ann Romney’s defense of the incident to Diane Sawyer. With the Romney’s most recent defense of the incident and the recent conservative jabs being made at Obama, it’s clear that the issue of the presidential candidates’ dogs and treatment of canines isn’t going away anytime soon.

Read: Ann Romney Says Dog on Roof Like Riding Roller Coaster

So why is this issue regarding the Romney dog on roof incident and the presidential candidates’ treatment of dogs lingering? Don’t the candidates have bigger fish to fry and problems to tackle to help rebuild America than trading jabs on their treatment of animals?

While one might think so, the reality here is that the presidential candidates’ treatment of animals is important for the candidates’ perception amongst potential voters, especially those who call themselves members of the animal loving public. For the most part, it’s safe to say that political people as famed as Romney and Obama are far removed from the lives of the average person. Stories like the Mitt Romney dog on roof incident give insight into a person’s character and personality, important factors voters consider in their choice for supporting a candidate.

“Stories like these stick because people want to know what these people who are so removed from them are really like,” says Professor Bob Lehrman, author of The Political Speechwriter's Companion: A Guide for Writers and Speakers. “They are small stories with a big meaning.”

Read: Protests Against Romney for Dog Trip

The troubles that Romney has faced for the dog on roof story and the potential backlash Obama will receive for the published excerpt aren’t without precedent. Back in 1964, President Lyndon B Johnson experienced similar issues with the media when a photographer caught him picking his beagle off of the ground by his ears. The issue lingered on, causing a storm of protest and backlash from those in the animal welfare world. Johnson constantly defended himself, claiming his beagle liked it when he did that, but was eventually forced to apologize after the issue would not let up.

Most likely, as it already has, the Mitt Romney dog on roof incident will continue to dog him until the general election comes to an end. Like it or not, it is a story that people will look towards to reveal character. In an election where every seemingly small item is dug up about a person’s past, you can be sure that the Mitt Romney dog on roof story is one that will constantly be brought up by Romney’s opposition and detractors. On the same note, Obama’s detractors will cling to the excerpted admission that he had eaten dog.

This is politics, where everything is magnified to the nth degree. Whether dogs decide the 2012 election, however, waits to be determined.  

Will dogs decide the 2012 election? Share your thoughts in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Ryan Karpusiewicz Ryan Karpusiewicz is the Assistant Editor, Lifestyle, for Digital Works @ NBC U, whose main…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (4)

Rana (Unverified)
Hi, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just coruuis if you get a lot of spam comments? If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can advise? I get so much lately it's driving me insane so any assistance is very much appreciated.
Barbarra (Unverified)
Would you take your dog on a roller coaster? The fact that the dog was sick most of the way, tells me the dog was NOT having fun! This happened before Obama was in the picture. Obama didn't start the story of the dog on the roof of the car. It takes an idiot to do something like that. From Boston to Canada in 12 hours?
Hanaa (Unverified)
Yay! Gotta love a happy ending for kiettis . I have 3 former strays, and love them all. Wish they'd get on the stick with the mice, thou, as I heard one in the house last night!
Anonymous (Unverified)
This is just a silly distraction. How a vacationing dog was transported in an overcrowded station wagon or what a child ate in a third world country is not an issue to me as an animal lover. I live in Southeast Louisiana. Since the drilling moratorium, family pets have been ripped away from their homes to die in overcrowded shelters. With the economy and our president's "laser-like" focus on jobs, this trend is multiplied all over this country. More dogs died annually in shelters under Obama than Bush! I'm voting president who will turn the economy around for ALL family members!
heidi (Unverified)
I so agree with you that more dogs are being killed in the shelters because people have had to turn them because they could not afford to keep them under Obama and if he is elected again more will be put in the shelters. And Obama is not a saint either with signing legislation legalizing horse slaughtering again and trying to pass legislation to kill the wolves in Idaho.
Katie (Unverified)
Well, it seems to me that it's more likely the numbers of animals in shelters are increasing because the numbers of animals are increasing. While spay-neuter campaigns have been pretty successful, there are a lot of people breeding their animals and it's pretty obvious that the amount of dogs is increasing. The economy *is* improving - albeit slowly - from where it was when Obama was first elected president, so I figure the numbers of dogs in shelters are just rising because the number of dogs in general is. And just for the record - Obama didn't legalize horse slaughter. Actually, horse slaughter has been legal all this time, in case you didn't notice. However, in 2006, Congress cut off funding for USDA inspections of horse slaughterhouses in the U.S. Because meat that isn't USDA-inspected can't be sold successfully, horses started being shipped overseas. But in a huge spending bill passed in 2011, that amendment was removed, so that technically funding is allowed. It did NOT, however, actually give money for funding. Personally, I think it would be far better for the horses if they were slaughtered in the U.S. - they wouldn't have that awful trailer ride to Mexico or whatever place they're sent, and I believe it's been documented that slaughter in the U.S. is more humane. Oh, and about the wolves - exactly what legislation are you talking about? I couldn't find it, but the numbers of wolves in Idaho are certainly enormous, and it might not be a bad idea to try and come up with more humane ways to reduce numbers than the current system.
Harry Reid Sucks (Unverified)
25 years ago, my Dad would have strapped us to the roof of a car. We rode in the back of pickups all the time. Different time, and the dog probably loved it.