Obama's Oil Decision Grants a Reprieve to Arctic Wildlife

Published June 1, 2010
Last Thursday, describing the tremendous oil spill as a "wake up call," President Obama announced that proposed lease sales off the coasts of Alaska, the Gulf Coast and Virginia will be canceled or delayed until 2011. Obama said, "I continue to believe that domestic oil production is important, but I also believe that we can't do this stuff if we don't have confidence that we can prevent crises like this from happening again. It's going to take some time for the experts to make those determinations." He also ordered 33 exploratory rigs to stop work right away. Even though the BP oil spill is the worst spill disaster in our nation's history, far exceeding the 1989 Exxon Valdez tragedy, there was passionate opposition to the delay. Republican Rep. Don Young called it "irrational and careless," saying, "The kind of event that happened in the gulf, while tragic, is so uncommon. It is akin to an American jetliner crashing. If a plane goes down, we don't stop flying." Alaskan Governor Sean Parnell responded that the decision was fear-based, without sound scientific evidence. He said, "Vigorous opposition has led to administrative and court challenges on almost every front." However both Alaskan Native and environmental groups claim that it would be impossible to clean up a spill in the Arctic waters, which are far from deep water ports and airports. The president of the Wilderness Society, William H. Meadows, said, "Until a full review of what happened to cause the devastation in the Gulf of Mexico and of Shell's plans to deal with a similar situation, it would be irresponsible to continue drilling as if nothing happened." Meanwhile, Jamie Rappaport Clark, Executive Vice President of the Defenders of Wildlife, promptly released an email sharing the news as it concerns endangered polar bears. Thanking the numerous people who took action expressing their concern for all the species that could be adversely impacted by any further "accidents" she wrote, "Today, your hard work paid off, as President Obama and Interior Secretary Salazar acknowledged the very serious threat that drilling activities pose to the sensitive ecosystems that sustain the Chukchi's polar bears, bowhead whales and other wildlife." She also cautioned, "Today's announcement by the Obama administration is a HUGE victory in our fight to prevent the next offshore oil disaster, but make no mistake: Our fight is from over." In a statement to the press made on May 27, Richard Charter, Defenders' Senior Marine Policy Advisor, wrote, "President Obama and Interior Secretary Salazar should be commended for suspending Shell's plans to drill in the Arctic Ocean this summer. The Arctic environment absolutely could not stand an oil spill like the one we're now seeing in the Gulf of Mexico -- any spill, in fact, would have devastating effects on Arctic wildlife, and it's clear that we couldn't clean it up." But what I cannot "grok" no matter how hard I try, is the apparent lack of concern for our precious wildlife these oil companies display. Sadly they seem to leave them out of their primarily financially-based equation. These irreplaceable species are global treasures that must be preserved at any cost. Every bear, marine animal, fish and bird, lobster, snail and other creature that lives in these waters is a jewel in the Earth's crown. We must preserve the balance of nature; while at the same time consider our much needed energy resources in a careful, sane and humane manner. Share your thoughts about President Obama's decision by leaving a comment.
Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (6)

Anonymous (Unverified)

The people who oppose oil drilling have no idea what unspeakable hardships they would bring upon themselves and their loved ones were their whim to be granted.

All around you are arrayed the products of earth, brought to you for your pleasure by servants powered by oil and gas. Take away the oil and gas, and your food, your clothes, your nice home, your shampoo, your nail polish, everything around you, all of those pleasant surroundings disappear.

It is easy to forget in our current wealth that our great-grandparents lived in houses made of logs and sod, heated with wood they cut themselves, and suffered through an average lifespan under 50 years.

We use oil and gas because these products are abundant and inexpensive and because of the unique suitability they offer for our needs.

One year later, the BP spill has disappeared.

But the damage to our economy from zealots blindly opposed to oil and gas drilling can impoverish future generations.

kat (Unverified)

It wasnt "our" oil spill it was Britains owned BP in our waters, but all of OUR worker are out of work because of it. Our wildlife is held in such high regard, as beautiful as they are they do not deserve higher status than human beings. Why is it that all of these "dont drill" obamanites want to save the whales but kill the human babies by believing in abortions. Seriously a terribly screwed up mentality.

Dsgusted (Unverified)
A little late, perhaps, but: We need be aware that we are destroying the TRUE treasures of the earth - the wildlife, the land, environment - through our reckless drilling. Indeed, the oil companies care not a whit for anything but $$$$$. I believe we can safely say that the proponents of drilling - continued drilling even in the face of what we now know to be corrupt and reckless practice - they do not cre a whit, either. Because Oil doesn't give a damn, those who do care have to be all the more active in opposing oil drilling etc. And we must Not make the grave mistake of focusing too much on the current, BP Oil spill. The oil crowd would love for us ot make BP into the fall guy, as though BP was the most guilty, most derelict, most reckless, corrupt, or whatever. In reality, ALL Energy corporations are just as bad, but BP got "caught" First. In fact, the North Slope of Alaska is an oil mess. In fact, there are countless unreported leaks and cover-ups in offshore drilling fields. No, we have to focus on ALL Energy - King Cole included, BTW. And we really have to think back to the top secret meeting Cheney and Energy Bosses had before Bush took office - no public, no environmentalist, no nothing invited except Big Energy. So - 1) Keep up and intensify the opposition ot drilliong and other Energy nightmares; 2) Keep at the forefront the reality that ALL Energy Industry, not just BP - is extremely problematic; 3) pressure Obama to investigate the proceedings of the Cheney/Energy cabal. (The Supreme Court said the Public does not have the right to know. Perhaps Obama does . . .?)
Concerned (Unverified)
I think it's insane that we continue to use fossil fuels in this way. When I was a child in school they were already talking about having to ween ourselves off of them. There's no excuse for it but that the oil lobbyists control much of the goverment. Much less now, thankfully, but they still wield a lot of power. American citizens are going to have to make a stand at some point.
Iniki (Unverified)
With so many ways to produce energy without petroleum products we need to just give up on this whole oil thing. It would save the Earth and be more environmentally safe for everyone.
jmuhj (Unverified)
No question but that it's way past time for the dependence on petrochemicals to end. From every angle, it's just plain WRONG to continue the thoughtless consumption of oil. One way or another, it will happen -- it would be much better, of course, if we as a species did the right thing out of compassion and intelligence, rather than having to be forced to do it out of desperation.