Miami-Dade County Animal Shelter Considers Going No-Kill

Published August 27, 2012

Flickr User zanehollingsworth

Miami-Dade County considers a no-kill philosophy. Read more below to find out!

Miami- Dade County Animal Shelter is a public facility and as such must accept any animal surrendered to them, whether adoptable or not. While Animal Services claim they are saving 72% of the surrendered dogs, the euthanasia rate for felines still remains much higher. As a result, Miami- Dade County Animal Shelter has been under the gun for the high annual rate of animal euthanasia, which has reached upwards of 30,000 each year.

To help rectify this situation, the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners recently made the decision to investigate plans which would allow them to finally designate the area Animal Services Department Shelter as a no-kill facility. The resolution was designed based on the No-Kill Equation programs in the United States that were developed by the no-kill movement which provides alternatives to the euthanasia of shelter animals.

According to the press release  issued by Miami-Dade County, milestone legislation was proposed at the July Board Meeting by Commissioner Jose “Pepe” Diaz to make Miami-Dade Animal Shelter a no-kill facility. After the proposal was well received, Diaz commented, "Pet owners and animal lovers throughout Miami-Dade have been waiting for a no-kill policy to be implemented at our Animal Services Department. As a pet owner myself, I look forward to seeing this plan in action in the coming months.”

Carlos A. Gimenez, the Mayor of Miami-Dade County is himself the ecstatic owner of two wonderful pets, one of which is a rescue dog; he was extremely pleased with the Board's decision to begin implementing the plan as soon as possible.  Since the County Animal Services Department Shelters are going no-kill, Mayor Gimenez is hopeful that this move will encourage residents to visit their shelter more often, and ultimately adopt many of the shelter’s resident animals and give them a permanent, caring home.

But to be officially designated as a no-kill facility means that the facility must have a 90 percent or better rate of animals that are saved at the County's animal shelter. But in the case of animals with untreatable medical conditions or intractable aggressive behavior, there is an allowance for the remaining 10 percent of the shelter animals to be humanely euthanized.

And while the committee unanimously passed the proposal, before this plan can be implemented, there are several considerations to be ironed out. The committee asked the Gimenez administration to report back to the committee in six months, following a thorough exploration, to ascertain if the proposed no-kill model is financially feasible.

This writer is hopeful that the Gimenez administration will find the funds and resources necessary to actualize their no-kill shelter model. The members of the Miami- Dade Board of Commissioners deserve a lot of credit for recognizing the importance of a no-kill model, so that many more animal lives may be saved.

What are your thoughts about no-kill shelters? Share your thoughts in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (25)

Anonymous (Unverified)
No Kill, LIFE- SAVING, and FUNDING-- This is one of the better articles written that explains the No Kill goal of MDAS moving forward. However, we would like to address the misconception that the county will incur substantial costs associated with a no kill implementation plan, the plan which implements the No Kill Equation's policies and programs. SEE: http://www.nokilladvocacycenter.org/shelter-reform/no-kill-equation/ While no kill shelters have incrementally increased their budgets to continue saving upwards of 90% of the total shelter population, not all or even most have asked for funds at the onset of implementation. The point here is that DOLLARS will not save necessarily save lives! DOLLARS will HELP to support the needed Trap Neuter Release (TNR) and Low to No Cost Spay and Neuter programs to complete the No Kill Equation steps, particularly TNR which is all but absent from MDAS. If the Miami community proactively practices TNR, it is estimated that 1/2 of the shelter's CAT intake would diminish, therefore freeing up space for non-feral cats. Furthermore, low cost spay and neuter would support responsible pet ownership, and pet retention in Miami-Dade. In that respect we support the Pet's Trust Initiative however, we do not support the premise that the money will saves lives--That simply is not accurate. The richest shelters in our country have some of the highest KILL rates. Conversely, shelters with small operating budgets have some of the highest SAVE rates. By all means VOTE YES for the Pet's TRUST, but know there is a lot more to LIFE-SAVING. There is no proven correlation between $$ and life-saving as documented in the report below (pages 4-5): http://www.nokilladvocacycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/econbenefits.pdf Overhauling the intake procedure to assure proper medical and behavior assessment, medical treatment, hygiene protocols, clear and accurate intake photos and tracking are in the works. ALL of the above are or should be a part of any shelter's operations, procedures we are already paying for. Do they need improvement? YES, absolutely!! But these "improvements" do not cost the shelter or the taxpayer $. This is now a question of competent staffing and leadership. We believe the leadership is there but they do need assistance from all of us. Once MDAS gets the right staff in place they will succeed, we are sure of it. We have a saying-GET THE RIGHT PEOPLE ON THE BUS! This is a work in progress, progress that calls for YOUR HELP. Please VOLUNTEER as needed for a No Kill Miami-Dade Animal Services, and together we will be one step closer to no kill.
Anonymous (Unverified)
Kiss of death equates to No Kill. You've been handed a death sentence for your shelter, not the other way around. Look at the failure of Philly with a hand picked management staff by No Kill. On the verge of having cruelty charges filed, the contract was virtually yanked from the hands of No Kill overnight. There are many more examples of the failure of No Kill. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/animal-rights/no-kill-movement-savior-or-scam
Anonymous (Unverified)
Hi Randy - Imagine seeing you here!
Anonymous (Unverified)
What about the 51 open admission No Kill Communities that currently exist in the US? I didn't see anything about cruelty charges filed against all of them? All of this 51 open admission No Kill shelter have successfully implemented the No Kill equation and everyone of them has a life release rate of at least 91%.
Anonymous (Unverified)
Hello Pat!
Anonymous (Unverified)
I am happy when I hear of an animal shelter that is going no-kill. Thank God we have another animal shelter on our side. You have to look at it this way, it is not the animals fault it is homeless it is people who do this.
KatWrangler (Unverified)
I have two emotions about this article - I am SO very happy that Miami-Dade wants to go No-Kill. However I am extremely unhappy that this seems to apply to dogs only –again. I know I can sound like a broken record to some, always pointing out that cats are treated as 2nd class, and more abused, and somehow unworthy of our care and consideration. But this article seems to add weight to my argument. I sent my rather strong opinion to a site who’s vetting a PBS special on shelter pets, but the program featured dogs ONLY. When we talk about “pets”, many of us include other animals. This special can unwittingly reinforce the negative views some people have about cats. And that is a very sad thing. If I had one wish, it would be that, somehow, people could be enlightened about the beauty of our feline companions, and know that all animals deserve our love.