Mandatory Neuter- Spay Law Proposed in Deltona Florida: Saving Animal Lives and City Funds

Published June 14, 2012

Outdoor Cat: Getty Images

A spay - neuter law may be on the way for Deltona, Florida. Spay and neuter laws like this could go a long way for animal welfare.

It seems that with all the negative publicity concerning the plight of the colony of feral cats ousted this past April by the Loews Hotel Chain  in Orlando, Florida may have sparked a growing interest by City Commissioner Heidi Herzberg, a passionate animal welfare advocate with some excellent ideas which will both save the lives of feral cats and dogs, control animal population and help Volusia County, Florida residents to be able to afford neutering and spaying their pets.

According to an article in our local newspaper, the Hometown News, the city of Deltona, Florida is looking at the spay/neuter law. Presently the city pays Halifax Humane Society approximately $160,000 a year for the local animal control officers to capture, transport and impound. The breakdown of the numbers of captured animals in 2011 was 505 dogs, 1,266 cats and 128 of other animals. At least fifty percent of these captured animals are euthanized by the Halifax Humane Society.

 Herzberg thinks that the money they are presently spending could be better spent by finding a much more humane system to handle feral animals in Volusia County.  During a workshop held  several weeks ago held in  Deltona, Herzberg presented her proposal to put in place a mandatory spay and neuter program in the city, to begin trapping, neutering and spaying feral cats,(TNR) and then returning them to locations around the town.  Additionally she proposed discounted neuter and spay services as well. 

In talking about the numbers of wild animals roaming the area, Herzberg said, “The numbers have not gone down. If you’re looking at $160,000 every year for five years, what we are doing is not working.”

Herzberg, who had been doing a considerable amount of research prior to the workshop on this issue, went on to describe how other cities in the area have been adopting measures similar to those she was proposing. For example, in the bordering town of Orange City that recently instituted a TNR program resulted in approximately 600 fewer cats being impounded at a savings $16,000. During the first year that their mandatory spay and neuter program had been initiated, the neighboring town of DeLand was able to save $34,000.

Since the average cost to neuter a pet in the area is about $40, the cost to transport, impound and then euthanize an animal is roughly double that. Herzberg said that her proposed program of mandatory spay and neutering pets would not only require any animal that is impounded during the year to be sterilized, but would also mandate residents to have their pets “fixed”. If the proposal is accepted, it would also allow the city to take advantage of grant funding which would offer residents discounted prices for spaying and neutering services.

The proactive TNR program Herzberg proposed is aimed at sterilizing feral cat colonies. From her own personal experience in seeing programs of this kind work, she reported that they have been extremely successful.

The Pet Vet Cruiser, a local veterinary service already offers discounted prices for sterilizing pets. The organization is thinking about purchasing another vehicle to expand its services. Although Pet Vet Cruiser has the capability of “fixing” 10,000 animals a year, its services cannot be tapped by the town until Deltona institutes a mandatory neuter/spay program.

Let’s hope that Herzberg’s dream to save animals will come true.  This writer thinks this both a humane and sensible solution that will save the lives of many animals, and preserve the local colonies of feral cats.  What do you think? Share with a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (15)

Anonymous (Unverified)
I think it this law is implemented in addition no punishment of owners that have more pets than the city allows would make the project work. I know a man who has dozens of cats and can't afford to "fix" them. He said if he brings in all the cats to be fixed, they won't be able to come back to the same address because technically the city only allows 3 pets per house. His cats keep multiplying.
Allyda
I love the idea of never ever hearing about another euthanized cat or dog just because they were homeless. I'll support this law any day anywhere! Would you euthanize people because they're homeless? Then why do it to our special friends, cats & dogs?
Anonymous (Unverified)
I think this should be a national law.> our city , in Tex, passed a city ordinance several years ago with a 3 pet limit but have never enforced it. I think all pets should be registered and spay / neutered. Only licensed breeders would be exempt.
Dog Lover (Unverified)
First the 6 to 10 million killedfigure is well out of date, and even the H$U$ admits that only 2 to 3 million animals are killed in shelters now. And the vast majority of those are feral cats. Also the US has reached the point on both coasts where there are fewer animals being produced than the demand, hence the transporting of pets from shelters in areas where there is still some killing being done, as well as the importation of over 300,000 pet animals from out of the US every year according to the CDC. And anywhere that mandatory spay neuter has been tried it has only driven kill statistics UP! The city of Los Angeles enacted MSN in 2008 and after the first year, shelter intake and killings were UP. Killings increased after the second year as well. The third year was yet another failure. Intakes and killings increased in Las Vegas after the city enacted MSN in 2010. When California was considering statewide MSN legislation in 2007, the past president of the California Veterinary Medical Association wrote a lengthy letter to the Board detailing his opposition due to consistent failure of MSM in other areas of the US. Killings and costs both went up in King Co, WA after MSN was passed in 1992. As a result, most every major animal welfare group in the country opposes MSN. That list includes: The No Kill Advocacy Center which explains “Why Punitive Legislation Fails” on their website. Alley Cat Allies points out that MSN does not reach most intact cats. "Best Friends does not support mandatory spay-neuter legislation as a method of pet population control." The “ASPCA is not aware of any credible evidence demonstrating a statistically significant enhancement in the reduction of shelter intake or euthanasia as a result of the implementation of a mandatory spay/neuter law.” The American Veterinary Medical Association opposes MSN. Memphis took in 15,401 pets in 2010 and killed 11,906 of them. 2011 was the first full year with MSN in place and the pound was closed for part of November while the facility moved to a new building. Intakes and killings dropped significantly that month, as one would expect. But even with the reduced numbers for November, MAS still took in 15,042 pets in 2011, killing 11,030 of them. As such, Memphis joins the list of cities where MSN failed to stem the tide of pet impounds and killings, as tragically, MAS killed 73% of the pets in its care in 2011. You can't pass legislation which punishes pet owners as a means to stop the killing. And you can't blame the public as a means to stop the killing. Instead offering low/cost spay/neuter is much more cost effective, as it does not put pet owners in a position where they can't afford to pay fines for retrieving animals from animal control when they could not afford to pay for spay/neuter in the first place. And this situation is what actually makes kill statistics go up in every single place that MSN has ever been tried. It's a failed idea with proven horrendous unintended consequences, and I wonder why the powers that be in Deltona have not done any research before considering implementing a policy that has been such a failure in so many other communities.
Reasonable Pet Person (Unverified)
From: ASPCA "Position Statement on Mandatory Spay/Neuter Laws" - To the knowledge of the ASPCA, the only method of population control that has demonstrated long-term efficacy in significantly reducing the number of animals entering animal shelters is the voluntary sterilization of owned pets (Clancy & Rowan 2003; FIREPAW, 2004; Secovich, 2003).There is also evidence that sterilizing very specific, at-risk sub-populations of companion animals, such as feral cats and animals in shelters, can also contribute to reductions in overpopulation (Zawistowski et al., 1998; Clancy & Rowan 2003; Levy et al., 2003; Lord et al., 2006; Natoli et al., 2006). However, the ASPCA is not aware of any credible evidence demonstrating a statistically significant enhancement in the reduction of shelter intake or euthanasia as a result of the implementation of a mandatory spay/neuter law.
Anonymous (Unverified)
Question: What happens when the feral cats are extinct in the area? Answer: The RATS multiply exponentially. Question: What happens when there are lots of rats - and no feral cats? Answer: More dangerous predators move in - like RATTLESNAKES!!!!
Anonymous (Unverified)
"Fixing" - an AR term!!! If it ain't BROKE - it don't need to be FIXED!!!! Having their reproductive organs, AS NATURE INTENDED, is NOT BROKE!!! Wake up - they've hi-jacked your language and ideas - next are NO MORE PETS!