Accidental Pet Death Shows Importance of Giving Appropriate Pet Medication

Published October 19, 2012

Flickr User michael-broad

A recent case in England demonstrates the importance of giving out the appropriate medication to our animals rather than giving them human meds. Editor's Note: This is not Midnight, the cat featured in this story.

While several drugs available to treat humans are routinely prescribed for cats by veterinarians, when it comes to pain control medications many of the products we commonly use are highly toxic to felines, and may even be fatal. Never give felines (or any companion animal) prescription or over-the-counter pain medication without first consulting a veterinarian, or the results can be devastating.

In cats, acetaminophen (the generic name for Tylenol and other similar drugs) is one of the most dangerous in the category of pain-killing, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications. Pets Web MD affirms that even a children’s dose can cause liver failure and one 500mg extra-strength tablet can kill a seven-pound cat. The danger of giving drugs to cats without veterinary advice was recently illustrated in England.

According to an item in The Telegraph, 45 year-old Claire Pritchard thought her cat Midnight may have been struck by a car when she noticed the kitty was having difficulty walking. Concerned that her kitty was suffering, Pritchard “innocently” gave Midnight a quarter of a 500mg tablet of paracetamol (acetaminophen) to alleviate the pain. The next morning, when she observed no improvement, she gave the two-year-old moggie a second dose. But when Midnight became listless and gravely ill, a family member summoned the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA). The cat was whisked off to a vet, but heroic efforts to save Midnight with a saline drip and an energy boost failed, and the feline died of organ failure.

A spokesman for the RSPCA said Pritchard claimed she gave Midnight paracetamol because as a child she had watched her mother do it. That said, she acknowledged that her mother could have been giving the cat feline-appropriate medicine.

"At the time she didn't know she had done wrong, but she didn't take the cat to the vets in the first place, despite having other cats registered with The People's Dispensary for Sick Animals (PDSA),” said the RSPCA spokesman.

As a result of her negligence, Pritchard was prosecuted under the Animal Welfare Act of 2006. She pled guilty to causing an animal unnecessary suffering and not providing the cat with prompt medical attention. Bournemouth Magistrates gave Pritchard a two-year conditional discharge, and an order to pay court costs of 280 pounds ($466.00). No ban was issued preventing her from keeping animals.

What is extremely baffling to this writer is Prichard’s hesitance to bring Midnight to the vet when she noticed she couldn’t walk. Since PDSA is a leading charity that provides free veterinary care to treat sick and injured  pets belonging to people in need (to which Pritchard is a member), it seems unlikely that an inability to pay for her cat’s care is the issue.

With the fragile economy existing today in our country many people are struggling to pay rent and put food on the table. Many pet guardians are finding themselves forced to make difficult and painful decisions about their fur-family member’s care. Why can’t our country extend the same compassionate veterinary service that Great Britain offers its eligible citizens? What is your opinion? Share your thoughts in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (5)

Catnip Hill Gang (Unverified)
If any of our animals even looks the least bit off they are whisked to the vet for a checkup. They are only allows medication that is vet approved. I saw the result of Harts products and also people meds on animals. It was saddening to see animals put into crisis as a result of wrong medications. Tylenol is a scary product. Read the ingredients sometime. It contains Shellac. I am sorry for her loss. It was a hard lesson to learn. Best keep the at home too.
EAS (Unverified)
Giving pets free medical care or reduced cost medical care would be a compassionate thing to do.
Reno (Unverified)
While I am very sorry for this woman's loss, I fail to see why the cat was not taken to the vet immediately when she noticed the cat's inability to walk properly. As the author of this piece noted, the owner was already a member of a charitable organization that provides vet care for indigent individuals. I can't wrap my head around people's ignorance when it comes to giving medications. I would never dream of giving my pet anything without first consulting my vet. And I agree with the writer that vets should have some kind of program for indigents. There is Care Credit which is a big help, but if you are unemployed, underemployed or have bad credit, it is not an option. My husband was unemployed for several weeks after being laid off from a job he had had for over 25 years. He found work again, but only part time and at a DRASTIC cut in pay. We are surviving by the grace of God and are able to meet our living expenses and housing obligations. (We rent and have no debt such as credit cards or vehicle payments.) But I don't know what I would do if I were faced with not being able to provide health care for our furbabies. It would be nice if the USA had a progam like England's PDSA. Perhaps instead of funding extravigant vacations for Presidents, outrageous salaries for members of congress/senate and robotic squirrels, our government should put some of that money toward funding a program like the PDSA. Just a thought....
Vicki Jasch (Unverified)
This is a very touchy subject for many people these days and this is difficult to deal with even if our economy wasn't in a near desperate situation. I do understand hardships, and that includes paying for veterinary care when it is needed. My vet bill resembles the gross national debt, but when one of my animals need to go to the vet, they go. I will get the bill paid eventually.
jmuhj (Unverified)
"With the fragile economy existing today in our country many people are struggling to pay rent and put food on the table. Many pet guardians are finding themselves forced to make difficult and painful decisions about their fur-family member’s care. Why can’t our country extend the same compassionate veterinary service that Great Britain offers its eligible citizens? What is your opinion? Share your thoughts in a comment." INDEED. I am but one of millions dealing with this reality every day, Jo. But the fact is that if it was a kid the woman dealt with in this manner, she'd be facing a lot more than this slap on the wrist, in the UK or the usa. Globally, we desperately need a huge shift in priorities away from materialism and consumerism to valuing the lives and wellbeing of our loved ones, of any and all species, first and foremost. Before funding other projects, we need to fund truly affordable care for our loved ones! and that includes care for the loved ones of those who, like myself, are struggling daily to meet basic survival needs.