Attack on Guide Dog for the Blind Spurs Legislation Protecting Them

Published December 24, 2012

Flickr User georgehawkins

Guide dogs for the blind strengthen independence and mobility for the sight impaired.

A vicious attack on Dusty, a nine month-old German Shepherd puppy in guide-dog training made by a ferocious dog in Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey has marshaled dismayed activists to pass Dusty’s Law. The pending bill calls for criminal penalties levied against irresponsible dog owners whose canines injure or kill service dogs and those in training.

According the North Jersey News, Dusty sustained life-threatening wounds to his neck and head during the attack. Roger Woodhour, who has been raising puppies for the Seeing-Eye Guide Dog Training Program for 20 years, was Dusty’s foster parent. He reported that four of the Dusty’s teeth were broken when the dog jumped on him and slammed his jaw into the ground.  He said, "All I could think about was how to get Dusty out of the jaws of the dog. Dusty was looking at me with pleading eyes, like a human, bleeding all over the place."

Rushed to Park Ridge Animal Hospital, the injured puppy received a total of 98 internal and external stitches to his neck. Although he recovered from his physical injuries at the hospital, unfortunately the ensuing psychological trauma that he sustained forced him to have to leave the guide dog program.

If a blind person relying on their guide dog for enhanced freedom and mobility has their service dog attacked by another dog, that resource to their independence may be seriously impeded. Additionally, dog-on-guide dog attacks are not deemed criminal acts at this time, and are not considered police matters. Reports are referred to animal control officers and there is no guarantee that they would be able to immediately respond. Almost 44 percent of all guide dog users responding to a Seeing Eye's 2011 Dog Attack and Interference survey reported that they had experienced an attack.

New Jersey Assemblyman Robert Schroeder’s office called Woodhour days after the attack to arrange a meeting.  The idea for the bill was launched as a result of their dialogue and Assembly Bill 2723, (Dusty’s Law) was drafted by Schroeder (R).  This pivotal and crucial legislation mandates police response to a reported attack on a guide dog team. The pending bill now awaits Senate passage.

Quick response by law enforcement personnel is essential because the safety of a blind person whose guide dog is being attacked is in imminent danger of personal injury as well.  Blind individuals cannot use their sight to defend themselves or protect their dogs.

Additionally the bill provides restitution for the affected handler and guide dog. The bill also applies to working guide-dogs, guide dogs and puppies in-training. This is a cause that has been endorsed by the New Jersey Council of the blind for years.

New Jersey residents can take action to ensure Dusty’s Law is passed and signed into law by Governor Christie by contacting your local representatives. Tell them how vital this legislation is and how important it is that it passes.

If this bill is signed into law in the great state of New Jersey, perhaps the rest of the country move forward to  pass similar legislation. What do you think? Share your opinion in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (13)

Edward (Unverified)
Do you mean to tell me that there is no law on the books protecting these dogs???????????????? What are the lying ,thieving politicians doing????????????? U S ARMY VETERAN
Anonymous (Unverified)
What an outrage! Of course it is criminal. Animals have no voice it is our job to protect them and an owner is just as responsible for their dogs actions as a parent for an under aged child. It is vital this law is passed nationwide !
Anonymous (Unverified)
I wouldn't want to be using a service dog for anything and have it attacked. Attacking a service dog is attacking the person with that dog, because most have no way to protect themselves or their animal. That puts them at risk of injury or death also. Laws need to be changed so these animals are protected along with their owners. That means that the police need to respond quickly when an attack like this happens, because it means the person is in danger also.
Anonymous (Unverified)
I'm surprised there wasn't such a law in place already for guide dogs and actually, any service animal.
Voysa Reezin (Unverified)
Absolutely! Anyone who harbors any kind of animal must be responsible for its actions, particularly in public places. This is no different from an attack on a human who is assisting a less-able person--- or an attack on any person or pet, for that matter!
Jean (Unverified)
I definitly agree with this law and hope that it passes. I wish Iowa would take up the same cause. A blind person has no way of protecting themselves and an attack on their guide dog is an attack on the person.
Iowan (Unverified)
There are already laws in place that prevent individuals from owning vicious animals. If a dog attacks another animal (service animal or otherwise) or human, both the attacking animal and their owners are held legally responsible. Don't just allow the media to whip you up into a frenzy over an article - research it first. (Iowa Code regarding dog ownership: Iowa Code Chapter 351. Dogs and Other Animals.) Note: It is quite likely that nearly every state has a similar code section on dog ownership, but I didn't check them all...