Fur Often Flies in Pet Custody Battles

Published December 15, 2008

"Jade shouldn't suffer because her mother and I can't work things out," explains Riccardo Rainieri who lives on New York City's East Side.

The Rainieri's are divorcing after ten years of marriage.  They've amicably worked out a custody and visitation plan with the best interests of Jade in mind -- their 12-year-old golden retriever.

In the eyes of the law, pets are defined as property. Therefore, in divorce cases, a judge's decision about who gets custody of the pet requires no more legal consideration than deciding who gets the barbeque or the Barcalounger.

Circuit Court Judge Amy Williams presides over family court cases in Pinellas County, Florida. She's noticed an increase in pet custody issues since 2002 and has determined custody in cases involving dogs, cats, horses, a pig -- even an aquarium.

"When it comes to pets, there's really no legal equivalent to child custody, so it's best if the couple can work out these issues before coming to court," she explains. "Otherwise, who gets the pet will ultimately become a property issue."

In the Rainieri's case, it may have been easier to come to a reasonable agreement because Jade has been diagnosed with cancer. The couple has set aside their differences to give Jade the love and support she needs during her treatment.

But most couples have a "ruff" time being so reasonable.

In the Midwest, a divorcing couple was clawing over the family felines.  The wife claimed the cats ran away, but the suspicious soon-to-be ex-husband hired a private investigator to tail his former love. The investigator captured the woman at home with the cats in question on video. The husband then sued for joint custody in court.

A divorcing duo in Arizona insisted that the judge write into the final orders that along with joint custody of the children, they would also share joint custody of the family cat and all the hamsters.

Even the famous fight over pets. Actress Kirsten Dunst and ex-lover Jake Gyllenhaal made news recently when they were embroiled in a custody battle over their German Shepherd, Lovey.

So, why are more and more couples willing to fight like cats and dogs over the family pet?  Consider the findings of a national pet owner survey conducted by the American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) in 2004.

-93 percent of pet owners would be willing to risk their own life for their pet;

-83 percent of dog owners refer to themselves as "mommy" or "daddy";

-Nearly half carry pictures of their pet in their wallet.

There is some good news for pets in the middle of a break-up.

"Courts are beginning to reject a strict property analysis and consider the best interests of the animal in deciding which party will be awarded custody," writes Joyce Tischler, founding director of the Animal Legal Defense Fund, in an article urging lawyers to plan for more pet custody cases.

Along those lines, Williams adds that while custody is not determined on the pet's best interests alone, the court may consider these elements when equitably dividing the property and assets from a marriage.

In a case Williams remembers well, she awarded the family Golden Retriever to the wife, because the husband had purchased it for her as an incentive to stay sober after battling alcoholism.

In the divorce, the husband claimed the dog was his property because he purchased her. However, the wife had cared for the dog almost exclusively.  And she hadn't had a drink in seven years. Williams awarded the canine 'property' to the wife.

Need Advice?

If you find yourself in a custody battle over a pet, remember that animals are impacted much like children by the stress of a break-up. You need to watch for signs of anxiety, insecurity or confusion. Above all, try to put their best interests ahead of your own.

The Animal Legal Defense Fund (www.aldf.org) offers the following advice for those involved in a custody battle over companion animals:

  • Seek the counsel of an attorney to advise a strategic approach to a resolution that serves in the pet's best interests.
  • Begin to collect information to validate either proof of ownership or primary caregiver status.
  • Ask your attorney about alternative dispute resolutions such as mediation or arbitration.
--------
Kristen Levine With 20 years of "paws-on" expertise in the pet industry, as well as the highly regarded reputation…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (5)

Anonymous (Unverified)

What if you have owned the dog for 3 years before you got with somebody? Shouldn't the person who owned the dog prior get custody? I stuck 3 years of money and care and emotion into my dog before I got into a 2 year relationship. Now that we're thinking about splitting up she wants custody. I said I would be willing to pay her back for all medical expenses she has shared with me... Email me back with response please... Alaubmeier1@matcmadison.edu. Thank you.

jonathan
Not a Good news, a bad impact on the overall health of the pet. Uprooting their lives can cause them to act out and even become somewhat aggressive. NY state should do a law on this! Jonathan Berkowitz
Noela
Again I have to say, Shame on NY State for not helping in any custody matters,when the pets suffer the most.There should be equil visitation and custody if both owners love the pet!!!!
Noela
SHAME ON NEW YORK STATE for NOT having a Dog Custody Law !!!!
Noela
to hire a mediator is just getting someone who wants to make money from us poor souls who will do anything to get out pet. A judge should be the ONLY mediator!! The judge should open his ears and heart and listen to some of these heartbreaking issues and have compassion enough towards the pets and their owners. Joint custody should be the one and only solution!.