Enhancing Disaster: Cocaine and Greyhounds

Published June 14, 2010
No matter what species athletic competitors may be, whether equine, canine, or even human, it is essential that all laws concerning the racing sport are tightened to ensure an end to drugging of any kind. Unscrupulous trainers often resort to administering performance enhancing drugs to assure that coveted spot: the winner's circle. Not only is this a dangerous and abusive practice, it doesn't accurately demonstrate the true abilities of the contenders. When I watch a talented, ethically trained horse gallop past the wire to capture the win, I hope the victory was accomplished due to careful selective breeding, superior genetics, skeletal and muscular soundness, and excellent training. And since I avidly enjoy watching top-notch horse racing, on occasion, and other competitive equine sports, some folks may consider me somewhat hypocritical in my disdain and abhorrence of dog racing. But apparently this "sport" is riddled with its own brand of cruelty. These dogs are often subjected to constant confinement while at the racetrack, in cages so small they are unable to stand up or turn around. It has been reported that over one thousand dogs are kept in "warehouse" style cages at each track. While the Sport of Kings is by no means without its share of abuses, we are now becoming increasingly aware of the dirty little secrets that dog trainers and breeders often resort to for financial gain. Each year at commercial racetracks, thousands of dogs receive serious injuries like broken legs, spinal cord paralysis, broken necks and cardiac arrest. Some states do not require that records are kept on the number of dogs injured. Public transparency is not a goal. Massachusetts-based organization, GREY2K USA, is one of the most active groups involved in the protection of greyhounds. Their mission is to put an end to dog racing. And they recently released some rather disturbing facts about the widespread practice of drugging in the sport. Greyhounds were administered cocaine in Massachusetts, Florida and overseas in the past few years in order to "fix" races. And according to an article published on The Birmingham News website, a greyhound tested positive for cocaine at the Birmingham Racetrack last fall. The dog's handler was suspended for 60 days and fined, according to Birmingham Racing Commission documents and a greyhound advocacy group. The Racing Commission ruled that Pots Banshee, the dog that won the 10th race at the track on October 20, 2009, tested positive for benzoylecgonine, a common marker for cocaine that can be detected in dogs' urine for several days after the cocaine itself leaves the body. The purse from the race was rescinded and the handler was fined $750 due to the positive test, but was not charged with a crime. He was fined an additional $50 based on the evidence of "indictable medication" along with the presence of a syringe uncovered at the kennel. Based on these findings, Grey2K USA asked Governor Bob Riley's Task Force on Illegal Gambling to look into not only this incident but also a similar one in Mobile, which occurred last December. In 2007, 13 regular patrons were arrested at Mobile Greyhound Park in Alabama in a scheme to fix races using "male enhancement" products, according to authorities. Their plan was to bet on non-drugged dogs with longer odds, in hopes that the pills would exhaust the favored dogs to which they were administered. Three of the patrons were arrested on charges of tampering with racing, but all charges were dropped eventually. Sounds fishy to me! After all, it is only involves innocent animals. Read more about Grey2K USA by clicking here. What are your thoughts about dog racing or animal racing in general? Discuss them by leaving a comment.
Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (13)

natural gas to propane conversion (Unverified)
Thanks a lot for the post. Much obliged.
massage Fort Wayne IN (Unverified)
Thanks for the post. Cool.
fence installation denver (Unverified)
Awesome post.
Level 1 First Aid Training (Unverified)
Appreciate you sharing, great article.Thanks Again. Keep writing.
Jen Krebs (Unverified)
Sorry about the funny symbols in my comment. I'm not sure why that happened!
Jen Krebs (Unverified)
This article was extremely well written. Thank you so much, Jo, for posting it on this blog. Regarding the case at Birmingham Race Course, you'll note that the trainer was also fined for having a dosing syringe in the racing kennel. That doesn't sound much like an accident to me. Yet, he pays a fine and is suspended for a little while, and then goes right back to training greyhounds to race. Strict testing in greyhound racing, Jason? That is false. Only when dogs place in first or second are they tested for drugs. Here's another example of a dog testing positive for cocaine, this time at Palm Beach Kennel Club in Florida: http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/juice/2010/06/greyhound_cocaine_palm_beach_kennel.php At the end of that article, you'll find that there have been 170 cases of positive drug tests in Florida this fiscal year per the DBPR. 170!!! Whether the dogs are testing positive due to transference from handlers, or as a result of a purposeful administration, it shows yet another danger and form of abuse faced by racing greyhounds. It's time for this cruel and inhumane "sport" to end.
Jason (Unverified)
This subject was very poorly researched by the writer, as was the Birmingham article. There are strict testing procedured in greyhound racing to eliminate bird brained schemes like these, and in the Birmingham case it wasn't a scheme or even race related. In the Birmingham case I believe they determined that the traces were so small that it was from incidental contact that was the result of a human user that was around the dog, not because someone gave a drug to the dog. In Mobile the article says these was a scheme being carried out by 13 patrons at the track, not by a dog trainer. No dog owner want's any of this to happen to their dog so you certainly can't blame them for it happening. That would be like blaming a bank for getting robbed.