"Dogs in the City": A Trainer Review

Published June 6, 2012

French Bulldog: Getty Images

Justin Silver stars in "Dogs in the City" and takes a crack at training urban dwellers, both on two legs and four. Is the show, or Justin Silver, any good?

Did you watch the new dog training show with Justin Silver, “Dogs in the City” last week?

You can bet I tuned in.

The first thing I did when I heard about the show was to research the show’s “dog guru,” Justin Silver. (Yes, I had a twinge of jealousy … “Why not meeee? When will I get a show??”)

Nowadays any reputable dog trainer should have a wealth of biographical information available online. Look up your favorite local dog trainer – I can guarantee that you’ll find the trainer’s web site detailing his or her credentials, training philosophy, and maybe even a blurb or two about them in the local press. Justin Silver’s web site was just created in 2010, and there’s really no information about how he got his dog trainer training, or his specific methodology. (When I was training full time my website was very clear about my philosophy, credentials, appearances and awards – I wanted potential clients to know what they were getting into!) 

I was dubious about this telegenic TV trainer. (And yes, a little sour grapes. You don’t have to point that out to me.) The show turned out to be better than I expected, but I do have some quibbles.

1. Justin Silver's timing was off in many of the training scenarios. In some instances this could just be a matter of editing – I’ve been in a few TV productions where I cringe at the way the set ups were pieced together, but that’s the unfortunate reality of reality TV. Specifically, his advice to Beefy the English Bulldog’s owner about his barking would actually encourage the barking, not discourage it; he told the owner to come into view from around the corner while the dog was barking “to let him know you’re here. ” Dogs do what works, and if barking works to makes his beloved person come back, Beefy will keep doing it. Additionally, when Justin Silver was teaching Beefy to walk politely on leash he missed numerous opportunities to reward the dog’s good behavior. In dog training, timing is everything.

2. He was too physical when he didn’t have to be. Justin showed a young girl how to teach her Bernese Mountain dog to “leave it” when they passed food on the street. There are numerous ways to teach this behavior, but he opted to shove the dog's chest in the early stages, a maneuver this tiny girl could never replicate on her behemoth of a dog! Plus, why resort to physical means when you can teach it completely hands-free? (Hmmm, I think I just found the subject of my next Petside training video!)

3. He used a positive dog training term incorrectly numerous times. In the world of positive dog training, the word “cue” takes the place the more militaristic term “command. ” Justin used the word “cue” to describe a collar correction, or a jerk to the dog’s collar when the dog wasn't reacting properly, which turns his use of the word into a misappropriation. Call the collar jerks what they were and don't use a euphemism to make it look less aversive. They were corrections, which is a dirty word - and technique – to positive trainers.

4. He let a client bully him. Again, this was probably for the show. I applauded Justin Silver when he told a dog owner that her aggressive dog with a bite history shouldn’t go to the office with her. The owner pushed him to offer a solution, and he wound up showing her a management technique where Charlotte the dog was tethered a distance away from the door. Magically, suddenly, the dog became calm! The dog’s demeanor on the tether was probably another trick of editing. It’s unusual for a dog with that type of reactivity to settle so blissfully just because a leash was clipped to her collar … a behavioral shift that dramatic typically takes time and systematic desensitization, but that doesn’t make for good TV. Fights with dog owners? Good TV.

Believe it or not, I did find a lot to like about the show. Justin has great energy and presence – he’s very natural with both the people and the dogs. I enjoyed his in-depth Q&A with the dog owners. His use of a baby gate and activity toy for Beefy the over-bonded dog was excellent.  In another training scenario he muttered the word, “Distance, distance” to himself after Charlotte the office dog attacked a visiting dog, which led me to believe that he understood the importance of keeping a comfortable buffer between the dog and the stimulus when dealing with reactivity. (This is a core component of systematic desensitization.) And most importantly, Justin Silver leans toward the positive side of the dog training world, unlike a certain male trainer on a different channel.

Overall, it’s not a bad addition to the TV dog training world, though I still prefer Victoria Stillwell’s “It’s Me or the Dog.” (Of course, a show of my own would be best of all.)

What did you think of "Dogs in the City"?

 

 

Author's profile photo
Victoria Schade Victoria Schade has been a dog trainer for over eleven years. During that time she has worked on…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (16)

Anonymous (Unverified)
I think you actually gave Justin an unintended comment by calling him "no Cesar Milan". Justin certainly has limitations and no evidence of proper training but despite his mistakes I think he is 100 times better than Cesar because he does use many positive training techniques as opposed to Cesar's outdated and often cruel techniques.
Concerned (Unverified)
From my remarks at Life with Dogs and other media about this terrible program, hosted by an unqualified, certified amateur who hasn't a clue as to what he's talking about, much less doing, and who misrepresents himself as a behaviorist when he is nothing of the kind. This program is just another sham for big bucks that diminishes the seriousness of dog training, a profession that requires a great deal of research, study, and experience, and which is, what's more, a matter of public safety. Tonight marked the debut of Justin Silver's "Dogs in the City". A routine search revealed that Mr Sillver, whose principal line of work is that of a stand up comic and a dog walker, has neither certification or formal education as a trainer, nor credentials, experience or degrees in any of the animal sciences. His website offers only a single, affectionate recommendation from a dog shelter employee, but not a single one from a client. That struck me as unusual, insofar as Mr Silver claims to have been in business as a trainer for ten years. While this information alone would have stopped any savvy and responsible dog owner from engaging him, it certainly didn't stop Julie Chen of "The Talk" from introducing him as a "behaviorist” a puerile fantasy that Mr Silver could not be bothered to correct. While many of us here are exceptionally well informed and savvy dog devotees, few if any of us would dare proffer advice, absent long experience and proper accreditation, on national television. That doesn't stop Mr Silver, who offers a handsome, charismatic presence, reminiscent of John Garfield, in place of substance. That said, the show, which turned out to be a bare-bones entertainment and puff piece, was not exactly benign, either. Mr Silver offered little if any real dog training as he put up with either naive or arrogant clients. Aside from offering a fashion executive advice about what to do with her beagle mix, an insecure dog that he naively -- and incorrectly -- evaluated as "aggressive", his principal concern was to assuage the egos of the owners. But then, something went terribly wrong, and anyone with even a modicum of knowledge about canine behavior and responsible dog training must have seen it. That it was disturbing is an understatement. A little more than halfway into the program, Mr Silver accompanied a young daughter of a client, a former police officer, to a park. along with her Swiss Mountain dog. The girl was probably no more than 12. Taking a seat, Mr Silver pulled out a few treats, which was a welcome relief as nowhere else in the show (save for a walk with a bulldog) did he use food as either lures or rewards. Evidently at least one principal of behavioral training, namely reinforcement, hasn't yet entered his vocabulary. In an effort to teach the dog a simple "leave it" cue -- that is, getting the dog to voluntarily refrain from approaching food when put in front of him -- he hit the dog rather firmly, even hard, from underneath the chin while the dog still had his mouth open. This he did to prevent him from taking the treat on the ground in front of him. As the child looked on, Mr Silver then hit the dog, again rather forcefully, on the chest, pushing him away vigorously as he glared angrily at the dog, his brow knit, his face only inches away from the dog's face. Now that one bit of "training" pretty much summed up the essential poverty of Mr Silver's training regime as it sent up a huge red flag. But it got worse. Cut to a close-up of the young girl for her reaction to Mr Silver's teaching. Said she words to the effect of " Oh, all you have to do is hit the dog in the chest and he'll do what you want!" Brilliant, Mr Silver! Now, in addition to having advised folks, on his CBS website, that any dog can be taught to swim (which bogus advice is at once wrong and dangerous; brachycephalic dogs, which are not physically engineered for swimming, should not only NOT be taught to swim, but will more often than not sink to the bottom like a rock) , Mr Silver now proffers a wholly incompetent, unnecessary, and cruel method to gain the dog's compliance for one of the simplest cues. And this he does while giving a child - A CHILD! -- information so utterly uninformed as to potentially put her in danger should she ever emulate what she saw. Dogs do not respond well in general to kids putting their faces inches from their muzzles, while bopping them on the chin and hitting them in the chest. That's a GREAT way, Mr Silver, to insure that a child -- perhaps one or more who watched you this evening as you extolled as a virtue such blatantly cruel, irresponsible and frankly unprofessional behavior --- will most certainly be bitten, and bitten badly. The entire incident left me stunned, and even physically ill. Had I been irrational, I likely would have taken out my frustration on the television set. Thus, this program was hardly an auspicious debut, but just another sham designed to generate a false consciousness as it demeans the seriousness of dog training and the behavioral sciences. Nowadays, anyone an hold forth on anything on television, no matter their background, so long as it makes money and attracts advertisers. Perhaps next week I'll don a white coat and pitch a reality show that would put me in an operating theater as I perform open heart surgery on a geriatric. Why not? After all, by television network standards, I'm eminently qualified, precisely because I'm not qualified in the least. Given what I witnessed this evening, I can only wonder how the network executives responsible for this travesty can sleep at night. Thus I urge each and every one of you, as a matter of conscience and also public responsibility, to keep a very close eye on this show henceforth. After all, who knows what might be next?
Laurens Leash (Unverified)
Hi Victoria - I am a dog care professional and I hate this show so much that I'm writing a blog debunking it. In fact, through this blog I was contacted by Ellie/Charlotte (the aggressive dog of the first episode) who I put in contact with a REAL trainer. The aggression displayed on the show was 100% provoked and editing. Awful. I'm interested in your opinion of my debunk: http://www.laurensleash.com/the-dog-blog/
Reply from a CPDT-KA, APDT member (Unverified)
Ugh. Can't watch the whole thing. Many aspects of Cesar Milan: "dominant", "pack", yanking on collars...just needs to add tsch!tsch!tsch! Sigh.
Anonymous (Unverified)
I understand your basic feelings about what Caesar does, but stop and think. Caesar's audience is not competent people. These are people that cannot even tell their children no. It is the extreme that he is dealing with, not people that get dogs or have the fortitude to even effectively parent, much less establish a relationship of respect with any animal.
Heisy (Unverified)
Another idiot ! Cesar Millan is an idiot and so is is this dude with no knowledge!Im not wasting my time watching this
Ulysses (Unverified)
If Cesar Millan was an idiot he wouldn't be in National Geographic for 7 or maybe more seasons in a row....