Department of Defense Classifies Military Dogs as Equipment

Published January 8, 2013

Flickr/soldiersmediacenter

Military canines are heroes, not "equipment."

Although Military dogs are living, breathing animals, the defense department classifies them as “equipment. ”

Canines have been used in the U.S. Military ever since the Revolutionary war. These dogs saved lives, boosted morale and have contributed greatly to our fighting forces.

War dogs began their military service working as pack animals. During World War 1, their major task was killing rats in the trenches. One of the most famous WW 1 military dogs was Sergeant Stubby. He was the first war dog to be used on the Western Front, and during his 18 months of service, this plucky, unknown stray dog took part in seventeen battles.

During his career, Sgt. Stubby comforted wounded soldiers, saved a regiment from surprise mustard gas attacks and even captured a German spy; literally by the seat of his pants. His courageous exploits were prominently featured in most of the major newspapers.

Throughout World War II, over 10,000 highly trained military dogs were deployed to serve as sentry canines, scouts, mine detectors and messengers. Many of these dogs were family pets who had been “volunteered” by their owners to serve their country. Today, according to Milpages there are an estimated 2,700 military dogs serving alongside U.S. military personnel. About 600 military dogs have been deployed to Afghanistan and Kuwait. One of their most significant imperatives is sniffing out bombs.

Military canines complete a 120-day program featuring positive rewards, (with a preferred rubber toy or ball rather than food). It is designed to teach obedience and how to “sniff out” dangerous substances. These dogs become trusted partners and companions to the fellow soldiers with whom they are assigned. Approximately 300 dogs a year are retired.  But what future do these loyal and courageous canines face once their tour of duty has been completed?

According to the Washington Times  these canines have been classified by the military as "equipment". Upon their retirement they fall into the "surplus equipment" category - much like any obsolete military appliance, therefore are not returned back to the United States.  While these dogs are no longer euthanized, (which was one of the options facing these hero dogs after the war in Vietnam was over), the United States is not willing to defray the cost of the dogs’ return home. Instead they are given away, put up for adoption or even abandoned. However, it is estimated that the dogs could be shipped back to the United States on cargo planes at little cost to taxpayers.

Recently S.2134, (The Canine Member of the Armed Forces Act) was passed by the US House and Senate to honor military dogs, declaring them as Military Working dogs, (of all breeds) and will no longer be classified as "Military Equipment.” Instead they would be returned to Lackland Air Force Base with the classification o “Military Veterans” and in recognition of their service; United States heroes. They will be evaluated, retrained or if necessary, re-homed.

The Canine Member of the Armed Forces Act was amended into and passed in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. But due to political snafus, the bill’s title was changed to “"Military Working Dog Matters" and their reclassification was deleted to keep them in the “military equipment” category.

Public input is needed to help get the bill passed and signed by the President. It will restore the bill’s original intent; removing their classification as “equipment”, changing it to “military veterans”. Our courageous military dogs, who are living and breathing animals deserve so much better than being classified as “equipment”.

Change.org is petitioning the administration to take immediate action and asking the public to help. Let your voice be heard by signing it. 

Should war dogs be classified as “equipment?”  What do you think?  Tell us in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (13)

faramos (Unverified)
This article, while well meaning has a good number of sanfus in it. Foremost there's been a solid amount of information put out on this subject which the author doesn't mention including several reports by the Washington Post and NY Times about the issue of classification among all personnel, two and four legged. There's also no mention about how much of the hoopla made about these animals are all being "left behind" has been made by sources and organizations which are under investigation for fraud, including one "organizer" who fled the country after she was found laundering money meant for a start up. NPR.org has did a great service a few months ago bringing this subject to light as well as discussing the CMAF Act, which has numerous shortcoming which doesn't address a lot of very important issues like healthcare or forever homes, something that needs to be talked about if you want them to do well after service.
Ali (Unverified)
it is sad to think that this is what happens to military dogs in this day and age where so many people are against animal abuse and they have laws about it yet they are in other contries with dogs that I bet the owner would of wanted thier loving pup back home only to find out that it has been givin away or abandoned to fight for itself. I mean didnt we as americans decide that living breathing animals or humans should be protected and givin the best posible chance to live a happy healthy life with someone who loves us and is willing to take care of us. Then even thinking about calling "mans best friend" equiptment?!?!?!? who even thought of that? it is like calling a soilder equipment. come one think about it besides not being able to shoot a weapon they do the same job and help save the lives of the men and women serveing this country My vote is Give them the same treatment as a soilder, thier title is not equipment but it is and should be "Military working DOG" because they are apart of the military nothing less and as a military working dog just like any person of the usa armd forces should be honored and allowed to return home dead or alive
Megera (Unverified)
I know a couple of shops with dogs for protection and companionship that list their dogs as equipment so they can list the medical upkeep on the animals as 'repairs' for tax purposes. Since the dogs are vital to the shop's security, keeping them in good health is, after all, a business expense. The military may have its reasons for its listing of the dogs as such. Even so, the idea of them as veterans is a great sentiment.
jmarwalk
True, they are classified as equipment and as such are given a stock number but so are military personnel, in the form of an MOS or NEC. Beyond that, the information in this article is absolutely not true; the Washington Times is an invalid source of creditable information. Retired MWDs are NOT abandon overseas. Maybe at the end of the Vietnam War but in over 20 years in the military K-9 program not once have I ever known/heard of, an MWD being left behind. There are strict protocols in place for disposition. They are never just "given away" or abandon. Dogs that are still of some use can be transferred to another agency (e.g. civilian law enforcement), they can be adopted out (top priority goes to one of its former handlers, second priority is to any trained handler) and lastly, for health concerns when the dog's quality of life is diminished, the K-9 may be euthanized. But that is an absolute last resort. For any nay-sayers out there who may not believe me contact the DoD Military Working Dog headquarters, 341st Training Squadron, Joint Base San Antonio.
Abehs10 (Unverified)
Simply put a veteran is a veteran whether it be 2 legged or 4 legged. They have done what they are trained to do just like "human" soldiers and they deserve to be treated as veterans/hero's.
VickiJasch (Unverified)
As much as the term "Equipment" is offensive to us, to the military it is the term they use just as they do any other object used in the line of duty. However, I strongly believe that these very special animals should be given wonderful homes once they retire from active service. They deserve to have special treatment after the service they provide for our soldiers and their safety.
Reno (Unverified)
I don't like the "equipment" classification. I like the idea of them being "Veterans". And why, when there are several organizations to ship stray dogs from Afghanistan, Iran, etc. to the US, are these military dogs not brought home?!? Makes no sense to me.