California Governor Proposes Controversial Animal Shelter Law Repeal

Published January 30, 2012

could-be victims of the California animal shelter law repeal

Animals could become victims if a proposed repeal of a law in California regarding animal shelters and euthanasia becomes reality.

In the midst of a recession, states across America have been taking drastic measures by cutting funding to numerous programs that Americans use daily; yet, the state of California is making it clear that humans are not the only victims of budget cuts.

California Gov. Jerry Brown plans to propose a repeal of significant provisions to a 1998 law that extended the required number of days that animal shelters must hold dogs and cats before they can be euthanized from three days to six days. The author of the provision, former California State Sen. Tom Hayden, has launched an attack against Brown and his proposed policy, garnering the support of many enraged animal activists.

In a video posted to YouTube, Hayden calls on the governor to think carefully before enacting legislation that will put the lives of thousands of animals in danger—at the hands of the government. Referencing Brown’s own beloved Pembroke Welsh Corgi named Sutter, Hayden says in his video: “Governor, I see you're a dog owner…You love that dog. Your wife loves that dog. So stop and think. Thousands of dogs and cats are put to death needlessly every year. It's not a budget issue ... it's a humane issue.”

H.D. Palmer, spokesperson for the Department of Finance, tends to disagree, telling the San Francisco Chronicle that Brown’s proposition to repeal the 1998 law is indeed a budget issue costing the state of California an estimated $23 million per year. Palmer goes on to say that the law actually gives shelters with more euthanizations greater compensation than shelters with more adoptions—something Palmer says is a “perverse incentive".

Animal activists dispute Palmer’s claim, asserting that the current law encourages shelters to coordinate with nonprofit animal rescue groups in order to reunite lost pets with their owners or to find homeless pets loving owners. Opponents of Brown’s intended repeal have also created a Facebook page, Sutter's Friends, named after the beloved First Dog. The page seeks to spread awareness and garner the strong and united voice necessary to oppose the repeal.

Animal lovers everywhere understand the value of a pet’s life and it is important that the government of the state of California is reminded of the value of the state’s animals and the shelters that protect them. The shelters could be the place where lost pet and owner are reunited or where a homeless dog is finally given a home.

What are your thoughts on the proposed shelter law repeal that will apparently speed up the euthanasia process in shelters? Share them in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Amanda Kelly

Amanda Kelly is an Editorial Intern for Digital Works @ NBCU.

She currently attends Iona…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (14)

CLAUDIA
GOV. BROWN IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG IN THIS ISSUE. ANIMALS GIVE UNCONDITIONAL LOVE-GIVE HAPPINESS TO THE ELDERLY. GOV BROWN MUST FIND OTHER WAYS TO CUT BUDGET-HOW ABOUT SALARIES AND PERKS? HOW ABOUT UNION RETIREMENTS THAT ARE CAUSING CITIES TO GO BANKRUPT? STOP HURTING THE ELDERLY, THE TEACHERS, THE NURSES AND CAREGIVERS. THIS PROPOSED LAW IS WRONG WRONG WRONG. WHERE DO I VOTE OF THIS ISSUE???
CLAUDIA
GOV. BROWN IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG IN THIS ISSUE. ANIMALS GIVE UNCONDITIONAL LOVE-GIVE HAPPINESS TO THE ELDERLY. GOV BROWN MUST FIND OTHER WAYS TO CUT BUDGET-HOW ABOUT SALARIES AND PERKS? HOW ABOUT UNION RETIREMENTS THAT ARE CAUSING CITIES TO GO BANKRUPT? STOP HURTING THE ELDERLY, THE TEACHERS, THE NURSES AND CAREGIVERS. THIS PROPOSED LAW IS WRONG WRONG WRONG. WHERE DO I VOTE OF THIS ISSUE???
Anonymous (Unverified)

I believe in having no kill shelters! I don't believe pets ( dogs or Cats) none of them should be killed! Animals should have rights! We need to be their voice! The killing needs to Stop! Unconditional love is given to us from these animals and what do we give back? Stop the Killing!
The public should go and see for them selves all the dead kittens and cats and dogs that are being killed....... This should not have happened!! Stop the killing! I have heard people talk about places that have a no kill policy. and have no kill shelters....... We should make them all a no kill shelter!!!

Victoria

k
The loss of state funding for human programs generally does not result in the imminent DEATH of the humans involved. This proposal of Brown's is state-mandated murder of the helpless, widely considered barbaric in civilized circles. California can do better than this sick mass-murder approach to fiscal problems. There's still plenty of waste that could be resolved before killing innocent animals.
Mary E. (Unverified)

How about a statewide ban on breeding dogs without a license? How about mandatory spay and neuter ? How about anything but kill them...

From Montana (Unverified)

I agree, people breeding animals should have to have a license and be regulated by the state.

Anonymous (Unverified)

they should NOT be breeding animals period!!!!!!!!!!!