Caboodle Ranch Cats: Destiny Uncertain

Published June 28, 2012

Caboodle Ranch Fan Page

The Caboodle Ranch will no longer be the home of almost 700 cats due to a recent ruling by Judge Gregory Parker.

Almost 700 cats were confiscated on February 27 during the raid  on Caboodle Ranch, a 30 acre no-kill cat sanctuary, following an undercover investigation made by a PETA investigator posing as a Caboodle volunteer, along with allegations of animal neglect made by the ASPCA. Craig Grant, the founder and owner of Caboodle Ranch located in Lee, Florida, was charged with cruelty to animals. A hearing was held on May 29 to determine if the cats would be returned to the Caboodle Ranch.

The long awaited decision on whether the Caboodle cats would be returned to Craig Grant was announced a few days ago by Judge Gregory Parker. According to a news story published by The Florida Times-Union, Judge Parker ruled that the cats will not be returned to Grant.

Within his eight-page ruling, Judge Parker stated that the cats confiscated from the Ranch have been placed in the custody of the Madison County Sheriff's Office. The Caboodle cats are presently under the control of the Court where they will remain as evidence, warehoused and caged under the supervision and care of the Jacksonville, Florida ASPCA until August, when criminal charges against Grant will be heard. 

Dave Collins, Grant’s attorney, said they are considering an appeal to Judge Parker’s decision, while they get ready for the criminal trial on multiple charges of cruelty to animals.  Collins said, “It was tough for us to take. Quite honestly, we totally felt that we were right and the government was wrong, but we have to respect the court. I haven’t spoken to him yet, but I am sure he is dismayed. But we haven’t given up and we feel very, very good for our chances on appeal and in the criminal matter.”

In a letter sent to Judge Parker the ASPCA claims $250,000 was spent on medical care for the cats "rescued in the dire conditions" at the ranch last February. This includes the cost of ongoing veterinary expenses to treat the variety of medical conditions found in the cats such as lymphoma, polyps, blindness and respiratory infections. Additionally, the ASPCA claims approximately $1.2 million was spent to rehabilitate the animals in preparation for adoption if the Court transfers legal custody from the Sheriff of Madison County to the ASPCA.

According to the Huffington Post, Grant posted on his website that many of the sick cats had been dumped at the Ranch and the cats that needed medical care received prompt veterinary attention.

While the ASPCA is delighted with Judge Parker’s ruling, thousands of Caboodle Ranch fans were shocked and devastated by the Judge’s decision. Since many of the Caboodle Ranch supporters spent considerable time at the Ranch as volunteers shortly before the cats were seized, and had witnessed first-hand the proper care and loving attention that Grant bestowed upon the Caboodle cats, the judge’s decision was incredibly painful.

Although the criminal case will not be heard until August and the Court has control of the cats as evidence in the case, it is rumored that the ASPCA has already made plans to hold an adoption event on July 2. Since an appeal is pending, if Grant can clearly demonstrate he can provide Court-approved care for the animals, the cats could be returned to the Ranch.  It’s confusing to this writer why the ASPCA can justify launching an adoption event. It has been rumored that some of the officers have already taken their “favorite” cats home.

Of great concern to the Caboodle supporters is what the future holds for the feral cats housed at the Jacksonville facility. Feral cats are different than stray cats. They are “wild” cats with little trust for humans. The FAQ information posted on the ASPCA's website clearly states that feral cats do not make good pets, and should not be relocated. They should be trapped, neutered/spayed and returned to the location in which they were found.  Since returning the feral cats to the Ranch or putting them up for adoption as pets are not realistic plans, what do you think will become of these innocent felines?

In considering the Caboodle case, we must remember that the Caboodle cats were “throw-away” felines that no one wanted. Some were “dumped” and abandoned at the Ranch.  Many of the cats had serious behavioral problems their owners could not handle. They were taken in with compassion and given a chance to live out their lives in a permanent, loving environment. There are no winners in this case – especially not the cats.

Tell us what you think in a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (13)

Abigail (Unverified)
Not one of those cats should be injured. If they wreck, I will never again support your organization. Yes there were many cats, some with behaviourial issuesvbut as a physician we say first do no harm. Killing cats is harm!! I think the organization must help the man care for the cats he helped rescue. Otherwise, your mission I am sad to say, is not worth papercit is written on or server it is hosted on. Please ....care for these cats!! IF a cat is actually dying and suffering, that is one issue which is what euthanasia means but to murdering a gag for being unusual is just that -outright cruelty to animals!
Anonymous (Unverified)
Recommended my son bring his 2 cats there when he was relocating and could not keep them. He donated a few hundred dollars to help with their future care. Now we are reading this awful story about the ranch and are devastated. We would have somehow gotten the two cats rather then have had the ASPCA take them. What are the chances of finding them? It's been months but we just found out about this since my son was in a position to adopt the cats and after logging onto the site saw this terrible story! Any updates or advice would be appreciated. We want our kitties back if they are not having the good life we had thought they would have at Caboodle Ranch.
Anonymous (Unverified)
What was left out of the article is that this animal hoarder's *own* veterinarian has testified against him. According to the Court’s findings:

The evidence demonstrated “clearly and convincingly, that the Caboodle animals were not receiving proper and reasonable care while in the custody of Caboodle.” (Order ¶ 8)

“Caboodle’s own veterinarian testified that the number of animals on the Caboodle property on the date of the seizure significantly exceeded the limits he had recommended. . .” (Order ¶ 10f)

Caboodle “depended upon a continuing influx of new animals for its financial survival. It is more likely than not that Caboodle would continue to fail to abide by the recommendations of its own veterinarian regarding population limitations if the animals were returned.” (Order ¶ 10g)

“Sick animals were not adequately isolated. . .” (Order ¶ 10j)

“. . . Caboodle is clearly and substantially lacking in the resources, ability, skill and (most importantly) willingness to follow expert veterinary advice essential to an operation dedicated to the care of such a large and apparently ever-growing number of animals it seemed intent on sheltering.” (Order ¶ 11)

The problem is that animal hoarders are delusional. They believe that they are the sole saviors of all the animals they collect. So of course they are going to disregard the recommendations of the professionals they consult; after all, *they* know their animals much better than a trained professional (in their warped, self-centered version of reality, that is.)

Anonymous (Unverified)
My vet sent a cat up there last year. It had been abandoned on the doorstep of her clinic. She assumed the cat would have a safe home at the ranch, so when the news broke of the seizure and investigation, she was sick with guilt. She contacted one of her colleagues who she knew was one of the many volunteers helping to treat and care for these cats (and she also happens to be my former vet who is now semi-retired). She asked her to please look for the cat she sent there. My former vet was highly skeptical, given the sheer volume of cats rescued from the place. But lo and behold, she was able to locate the cat! :-) Sadly, although the cat was perfectly healthy when she was placed at the ranch, she is now blind as the result of the mistreatment and neglect she suffered there. But thankfully, the miracle kitty has returned home to the clinic, where she will remain safe until she is adopted by a loving and responsible owner.
Dr.H . T (Unverified)
My honest thought is that these and all the cats must be returned to the Ranch. They have no chance for a better life....they had a good life at the ranch. Esp...the ferals. I have 2 ferals with my other 9 cats and know how they are. They are very innocent and need loving care as the ranch was giving them. With so many cats in the US that need homes,the ASPCA should be involved with setting up TNR and building sanctuarys for cats themselves. Also helped the ranch out instead of destroying the ranch.
rescueworker (Unverified)
I know you are busy, but isn't it an obligation to fact check and search for all reliable information BEFORE you write an article, or is that a dated concept nowadays? Read the entire verdict and you will note that the cats are no longer CR property. You will also note that CR may not have any other animals in the future unless they can prove that adequate care can and will be provided for them. That is the appeal avenue. The cats are not sitting in a warehouse, but you would know that if you checked your facts. I won't even go into the current custody portion of this, but you would know the answer to your question if you did your research...
Joke (Unverified)
Of course Jo doesn't check facts. She just writes what Nanette tells her to write. She knows where to find the facts. In fact, I'm sure she's read them. But she prefers to tell more lies to discredit the ASPCA or anyone involved in the rescue of the cats because she doesn't want to admit her friends are responsible for the abuse and deaths of hundreds and hundreds of cats. It's easier to believe the fantasy than to face the gruesome truth.