Bill Preventing Landlords Requiring Declawing and Debarking Passed by Senate

Published August 26, 2010
Landlords often insist that requirements for declawing cats and de-barking dogs before renting an apartment to pet owners allows them to protect their property or prevent neighbors from complaining. In my opinion it is far more humane to require a pet deposit and hold the renter responsible for damages. But landlords, at least in California, may soon be stopped in their tracks. If you live in California and own a cat or dog and are searching for a residential rental, you may soon be able to do so without having to make the agonizing decision to declaw your cat, or de-bark your dog in order to move in. Some background on the issue: in April, 2010 Petside.com featured a blog item with exciting news concerning pending legislation. This California Assembly bill, AB-2743, aimed to prevent landlords from requiring tenants to de-bark their dogs or declaw their cats as a condition of their lease. Written into the law is a civil fine of $2,500 imposed upon landlords who break the law. Also, preferential treatment given to tenants who already have declawed cats or de-barked dogs, or publishing rental ads that appear to preclude cat or dog owners with intact pets would no longer be permitted. In an update published on Petside.com in May, we further announced that the California Assembly passed the bill 63-7 with astounding bi-partisan support. The bill was slated to be sent to the State Senate in June for further action. The next step, if passed, would be sending it to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to sign it into law. So animal lovers will be thrilled to learn that in a 21-12 decision, California bill AB-2743 was finally passed on the Senate Floor the other day. This is fantastic news for pet owners who rent apartments or houses. Senators listened to the huge number of caring pet lovers who wrote and/or called them in support of AB 2743, and the need for its passage. Their phones must have been ringing off the hook. And even though this good news is remarkable, it is by no means a done deal to assume that Gov. Schwarzenegger will sign the bill without serious opposition. According to the Paw Project, the California Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) strongly opposes this bill, and is lobbying hard to defeat it. They will work now to share their views with Gov. Schwarzenegger and are already enlisting members of the association to express their negative stand on its passage. On their website, the Paw Project states, "The CVMA is powerful because many legislators automatically support the position held by a trade or business association". So an urgent call to take action has been issued by cat and dog lovers in support of this bill. California residents who feel strongly that this law must be enacted can have their voices heard by telling the Governor how crucial his signature is needed by contacting his office immediately. And while phone calls are important, written letters are far more effective. For your convenience, visit Paw Project's site for more information including sample letters and talking points. If this bill is signed into law, I sure hope the entire country follows suit. Do you feel it's unfair for landlords to require renters to declaw their cats or de-bark their dogs? Leave a comment and share your opinions. Photo credit: Flickr user VespaGT
Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (9)

Anonymous
AND if the dumb property owners would realize that declawing can cause lots of other issues such as having to replacing entire rooms of carpet due to the non litter box use of declawed cats more than those with it would all work out!
George (Unverified)
I blame the complicit pet owners just as much as the landlords. I would never choose to rent from a landlord that required me to treat my pets inhumanely. Problem solved. No one forced the pet owners to agree to these contracts.
annie (Unverified)
i tweeted arnold to sign the bill. :::::smile:::::
R (Unverified)
Holy. God. Above. I cannot believe we live in a country where landlords can (and do) do this. This is so INSANE. It is like a property owner dictating that you impair your child (human) in some way in order to live on their property. While I do understand (although not agree with) their reasons for this, they should NOT be dictating ANYTHING of the sort to prospective renters. If you're going to go that far, just don't allow pets PERIOD. WHO on EARTH do they think they are to make such mandates?? No one has that right. I am glad this law passed. It's just sad that we need a law like this in the first place.
jmuhj (Unverified)
I called the Governor yesterday and registered my support for SB2743; I wholeheartedly believe declawing should be a felony worldwide, but the dog issue is one I'm conflicted on, as dogs' barking is noise pollution and should be controlled, but isn't by too many people, who put them outside while they are away working or out enjoying themselves, letting the rest of the world suffer the effects of their inconsideration. I believe that if people do this, the dogs should be confiscated. Enough of making the rest of us suffer!
fourhorsegal
I live in a very rural area and am also a landlord. I would never ask any tenant to alter their pets in any way. They do pay a pet deposit when they move in and so far this has worked out very well. I hope this law goes into effect in every state.
Kathy (Unverified)
I have had to rent with a pet and, thankfully, was only asked for an extra deposit to cover damages, if any. I didn't realize that some landlords required de-barking/de-clawing. I am glad that, at least in Califiornia, there are attempts to stop this.