AP-Petside Poll: The Debate over Declawing and Debarking

According to a recent AP-Petside.com poll, the majority of pet owners say that it is OK for people to declaw their cats, but not OK to debark their dogs. Cats were cut short when it came to asking American pet owners if they thought declawing was an acceptable practice. According to a recent AP-Petside.com poll, the majority of pet owners (59 percent) including most cat owners (55 percent) say that it is OK for people to declaw their cats.

While only over a third of all pet owners (36 percent) say that the declawing is not an acceptable procedure, the physical actions of cat owners polled might seem to suggest otherwise. Among cat owners, just under a third (32 percent) have actually had the surgery performed, while over twice that (67 percent) say that they have never had a cat declawed. Furthermore, cat owners are more apt than others to favor a law that would ban the procedure, with 24 percent favoring such a law, 16 percent strongly.

Although the issue of declawing a cat may be divisive, the general opposition to the procedure of debarking a dog, a surgery in which the dog's vocal chords are removed to address nuisances such as excessive barking, is much more unanimous.

Out of all pet owners polled, 9 in 10 (90 percent) stated that it was not OK to remove a dog's vocal chords. Additionally, nearly half (47 percent) of pet owners said they would be in favor of a law that would ban this surgery. To top the opposition off, only 1 percent of all dog owners polled had the procedure performed on their pet.

The poll's statistics reach the core of one of the most hotly debated topics amongst modern pet owners. For the veterinary community and cat owners specifically, the issue of declawing is especially resonant.

Advocates of the procedure state that declawing is an integral element of the adoption process for cats. Claws are sometimes seen as a "turn-off" to potential adopters. The fear, in turn, is that the presence of claws within a cat decreases their odds of being placed in a home. Cats that go un-adopted face possible euthanasia. For many in the veterinary community, the choice, then, becomes declawing or imminent death for the cat in question.

Opponents of the surgery, in the veterinary community and otherwise, adamantly refute the claims of the surgery's advocates. They argue that any nuisance caused by the presence of claws within a cat can be corrected with training and varied scratching devices. They also argue that people opt for the procedure because they don't really know what the surgery entails. It is a major surgery and one which many experts say causes extreme and unnecessary pain to the cat. On top of that, declaw surgery is already banned in over 37 countries worldwide.

The nearly unanimous opposition to debarking begs the question -- are we more sympathetic to the plight of dogs than we are to cats when it comes to these nuisance-corrective surgeries? Let us know what you think.

Image Source: Flickr user CaptPiper

Author's profile photo
Ryan Karpusiewicz Ryan Karpusiewicz is the Assistant Editor, Lifestyle, for Digital Works @ NBC U, whose main…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (12)

Anonymous
I have read an article and the veterinarian said that if they gonna be under go with the same surgeries this is very painful for the animals. -County Line Nissan
Agile (Unverified)
The term 'debarking' is not accurate. Dogs have their voices softened by a qualified surgeon where a small bit of the vocal cords are removed therefor softening the volume and tone of the sound produced. Dogs with softened voices still have lots of sound, are able to communicate with sound without any problem. When editors such as this are going to write about this procedure, the information needs to be correct rather than scaring people using horrific misinformation.
Chris (Unverified)
The DO NOT REMOVE the vocal cords during a "debark" procedure! The take a snippet out in the same manner as a biopsy is performed. Afterwards, the dog can still bark and growl and be heard by both other dogs and their owners, just the decibel level is lower.
Ray Ray (Unverified)
These are BOTH horrific procedures that need to be banned by any decent society. How selfish and cruel. If you're too worried about some cat scratches or a barking dog then don't get either one! Why is this even a debatable issue? What is wrong with people?
jmuhj (Unverified)
My beloved cats never claw furniture. Why? I provide cat furniture, cat scratching posts, and cat scratching pads in virtually every room of our home. Anyone who would even think of declawing should be banned for life from having cats. The concept of "pet OWNERSHIP" is so extraordinarily speciesist and WRONG -- it certainly contributes to the devaluation of members of other species by a society that values little, if anything, except power and greed. Progressive and compassionate people refer to themselves as caregivers or better yet, family members and the cats or other living beings they share their lives with as their FAMILY MEMBERS. "OWNING" other living beings is something morally and ethically repugnant to any caring person. As someone whose ancestors were "owned", I find it extremely offensive.
Barbara (Unverified)
I simply can't believe that a country as modern as the USA still believes that mutilating animals for human convenience is acceptable and even desirable. It's beyond my comprehension how someone can decide to take in a cat, knowing that cats have claws, and then have the arrogance to adapt the cat for the sake of a few sticks of furniture that they'd leave without a second thought if their home was on fire and they wanted to save themselves. And devocalising animals is nothing short of evil, we've already taken away their freedom to act naturally by domesticating them, but people in the US want even more - they want to take away their voices too so that when they're distressed or in pain they can't even cry out, and when they're scared or frightened they can't call for help, or when they're angry they can't shout. I am sincerely glad I am not an American I couldn't bear the guilt of being of a country which treats their companion animals in such inhumane ways.
Ruth (Unverified)
We in England are shocked and upset that cats are rated as second class citizens by most vets in the USA. Worse still that those vets are willing, in fact even encourage their clients to have their kittens/cats declawed, when the very same operation is banned in ours and many other countries as animal abuse. Thankfully even before our Pet Welfare Act which made all cosmetic surgery illegal,our vets would not do it. It's not compulsory for anyone to have a pet so why some people give one a home and then have the poor creature adapted I just don't understand. Don't like claws ? Don't get a cat ! Don't like barking ? Don't get a dog ! Simple as that.