Animal Cruelty: Misdemeanor or Felony

Published March 22, 2010
While we generally don't consider alpacas to be domestic house pets, Jeff Pergram, the owner of a three month-old, baby alpaca that was tortured and beaten to death last month, hopes that this horrendous act of animal cruelty will serve to strengthen the work of a state lawmaker in Ohio who is a strong advocate for passing tougher laws concerning cruelty to animals. These horrific crimes must receive the powerful and swift punishment that they deserve, with which I deeply believe that all animal lovers will agree. Mr. Pergram discovered Masterpiece, his baby alpaca in an abandoned barn in southwest Ohio in February. Deeply upset by this senseless killing, he is presently installing security cameras around the boundaries of his Middletown farm in hopes of preventing another such attack on his "beloved" animals. In an interview with FoxNews.com, Mr. Pergram said, "It's hard to look out there and see he's not there now. He was a real inquisitive guy. He was like a dog; he wanted to be right next to you, to nuzzle you." He assumes that Masterpiece's friendliness led to his death. He continued by saying, "He was way different. And it's a different generation of people we're raising right now." Two 17 year-old boys were arrested and charged in juvenile court with vandalism, animal cruelty, theft, tampering with evidence related to Masterpiece's death, and breaking and entering. They both are presently in custody at a juvenile detention center awaiting a hearing on March 30. At this time prosecutors want their case transferred to an adult court where the penalties for such brutal acts will be far more serious, if they are convicted. Additionally a grand jury is also pondering on whether to indict 22 year-old Stacie Mullin, a resident of Madison Township, Ohio, in connection with the killing, who allegedly transported the boys to and from the farm. Similar to llamas, alpacas are native to South America. The wool made from their magnificent coats is highly desirable. With an approximate population of nearly 25,000 alpacas kept in Ohio, according to the national registry, the state has nearly 20 percent of the nation's alpacas. Following the publicity concerning Masterpiece's appalling death, further reports have been made about another missing alpaca local to the area. Rep. Courtney Combs, R-Hamilton, states that it is now time for the passage of the Ohio House Bill 55 which will vitalize the state's animal cruelty laws. In speaking with FoxNews.com, Rep. Combs said, "Let's get this bill going. How can you explain the mind that works that way that would abuse a helpless animal? There's something wrong there." Proposing Ohio House Bill 55 late in 2007 which remains stalled in the Ohio Legislature, Rep. Combs is hopeful that Masterpiece's "high profile" torture and killing, along with the second missing alpaca, will spark increased interest and a thrust in the passage of the bill into law quickly. Rep. Combs reported that subsequently he has received many calls from anxious alpaca owners. Furthermore Rep. Combs is contemplating proposing a state animal abuser registry similar to the database of sex offenders. A California lawmaker has recently suggested a similar proposal. However, Butler County's prosecutor, Robin Piper considers Rep. Comb's bill insufficient. The way it is written now only permits the crime of animal cruelty, torture or killing of a companion animal to be a misdemeanor with psychological counseling required. The punishment for cruelty to livestock animals would only carry a 90 day jail term penalty. Piper feels that the state's animal cruelty laws are "antiquated" and need revision. He said, "This requirement should be more comprehensive and put into place anytime a juvenile is involved in animal cruelty, malicious injury, or torture of an animal -- regardless of what type of animal is involved. It doesn't make sense that someone can steal $500 worth of scrap metal and it's a felony, yet they can maliciously beat, torture, or kill and an animal worth thousands of dollars, and it's only a misdemeanor. I'm not trying to go on a crusade, but the law needs to be much stronger than it is." In this writer's opinion, it is high time that the crime of cruelty to animals be considered to be a heinous one throughout the entire country, punished by severe penalties. Since we already know that cruelty to animals holds dire implications for increased violence, it is an act that can no longer be tolerated. What are your opinions? Please leave a comment and share your thoughts.
Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (22)

Mustang
Thank you, Samira! I've read other posts wherein people have "quoted" the Bible stating reasons why humans are 'owners' of animals and 'have dominion' over animals. Thank you for quoting Ecclesiastes. I think this helps level the playing field.
Anonymous
The punishment should fit the crime. Like children and all innocents, every animal needs to be protected in our society, especially from sick and abusive people. Should be a felony and "throw the book @ them."
Larry (Unverified)
I understand Ohio is in the top 2 or 3 in puppy mills. It seems they need to do some soul searching when it comes to animal cruelty. Call your state reps and voice your opinion.
Wayne Comrie (Unverified)
Even should you for some reason have no sympathy for animals, there are still very good reasons to enact strong anti-cruelty laws and treat this as a horrific crime. There is a strong correlation between animal cruelty and violence towards humans. Injuring and torturing animals can be a stepping stone towards desensitizing oneself to cruelty and can create the appetite to do it. Jeffry Daumer started his criminal career as an abuser of animals, for instance, and how much better would society be if he had been arrested and incarcerated early.
SL_14B (Unverified)
I think it should be a felony to use animals in research/pharmaceutical testing facilities. I am so sick of the argument that they were bred for that purpose. The researchers are a bunch of monsters and should be prosecuted as such. These animals have no voice, they didn't ask to be born. See this link on the treatment of beagles as research subjects. It is truly sickening. http://www.terrificpets.com/articles/102145565.asp
Reno (Unverified)
It's the attitude of prosceuters like the one Shari speaks of that is a big reason why he has to prosecute rapes and murders. Did these people ever stop to think that if we severely punish animal cruelty and label them as felons for life that there would be less assault, rape, and murder because the criminals would have been caught and prosecuted and hopefully stopped with their first crime of animal abuse. Remember, animal abusers rarely stop there.....
Shari Sprague (Unverified)
We need to have courts specifically for animal related cases, with judges and lawyers who are educated on the human-animal bond and the implications of abuse, particularly if done by children. As a professional, I have had to testify in animal abuse cases, and have heard comments from prosecutors like "I have to prosecute rapes and murders, who cares if some kid beat a cat to death? There are a million more cats out there." It's that kind of attitude that lets kids and adults off with a slap on the wrist, when animal abuse is a dangerous predictor of future behaviors. Anyone who watches Animal Court and similar programs on TV can see that the judge often doesn't understand the issues involved, and the rulings are either too lenient or just flat wrong. Kids in my hometown recently set a cat on fire, repeatedly, and in another case, a housesitter's friends tortured and killed the family cat, while his friends watched and did nothing. All got off with minimal punishment because they were "just kids" and it was "just a cat." Until we have courts that truly understand these issues, these kids will be allowed back on the street, and then everyone will be surprised that they become serial killers-- everyone except the animal lovers who knew from the beginning how serious their actions truly were.