Animal Cruelty Leads to Jail Sentence for California Man

Published September 4, 2012

Flickr User rhruzek

A California man has been charged with animal cruelty after transporting his dog unrestrained in the back of his pickup truck let to fatal injuries. Editor's Note: This is not the dog featured in this story.

It’s possible that the judicial system may finally be starting to recognize that crimes of animal abuse and animal cruelty are truly serious in nature, and as such that they deserve more than just a “slap on the wrist” as a consequence.

According to a news item posted on  Fox News on Friday, August 31, the Sacramento County's District Attorney's office announced that Sacramento, California resident Phillip “Mohammed” Jackson was sentenced to a year in prison following his conviction of the felony crime of cruelty to animals. Jackson was also sentenced to serve five years on probation after he is released. 

Prosecutors said that Jackson unwittingly dragged his pit bull dog named Lovely behind his pickup truck, thinking that she had been properly tied down in the back of his vehicle. Upon discovering that Lovely was seriously injured after she fell out and had been towed behind the truck, he refused to take her to the vet for treatment. Instead, Jackson took her to a friend’s house, abandoning her there.

After two days, aware that the dog was suffering and recognizing the severity of Lovely’s injuries, Jackson’s friend called Sacramento City Animal Care, but it was too late. When the officials from the City Animal Care arrived they discovered a horrifically wounded canine who was barely hanging onto life.

The officers immediately rushed the tormented dog to a local veterinary clinic. However the veterinarian determined that her wounds were infected so badly and were far too grave for her to survive treatment. Lovely was then humanely euthanized.

In a written statement concerning Jackson's refusal to care for his dog, Deputy District Attorney Hilary Bagley Franzoia said, “Under the law, owners are not allowed to ignore the suffering of their animals, even when euthanasia is the only option to end excruciating suffering and death.”

This writer feels strongly that a law must soon be passed which would prohibit the transportation of an animal in the back of a pickup truck, or even in a carrier strapped to the roof of an SUV.  All small companion animals should be conveyed safely in the interior of a motor vehicle, in a carrier or on a leash without free access to open windows placing them at risk of falling out of the car or injured by a passing object. While a dog may enjoy sticking their head out of the window while riding in a car, it’s only common sense to realize that allowing this behavior is far too dangerous.

When we adopt a pet we are responsible for their health and safety. We make an unspoken commitment to them that we will keep them away from harm.  What do you think? Share your opinion with a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (10)

grown person (Unverified)
what am i commenting on?
Catnip Hill Gang (Unverified)
This story is very sad. I can understand that accidents can happen. What bothers me is the aftermath. That was cruelty for sure. My uncles German Shepherd fell out of his truck while he was making a turn. She crashed into the stones on the side of the road. We immediately rushed her to the vet. Her only injury was a cut lip and a broken canine tooth. My concern here is that: Would my uncle be considered cruel for letting her ride in the back of the pickup? She had ridden back there for years with no problems. After her accident she was made to ride in a secured cage in the back of the truck. I think that the punishment is VERY Light and the friend should have also been charged. That person caused the dog a lot of pain too.
Anonymous (Unverified)
Why wasn't the "friend" prosecuted as well? That poor dog lay dying in their home, in horrific pain and they did nothing....to me that is just as bad, if not worse. I'm glad the gov't is finally taking animal abuse seriously. They should also make spaying and neutering a law unless you are a certified breeder.
Abehs10 (Unverified)
Such a sad story! The fact that he had the dog in the back of a truck is unforgivable! Yes he was punished, but was it enough no way. As for his "friend" he also should have been punished for lack of treatment for the dog. The fact that he was charged and convicted is a small step towards the end of abuse of animals.
Patricia Riggleman (Unverified)
Thank god that the criminal system is starting to do something to the abusers of animal creuetly. I did not read anything about a fine. I think there should be at least a $ 4,000.00 fine for animal abuse that way the funds could be used toward other animals that are been abuse and help with there medical care and other things.
Anonymousannie (Unverified)
this is so sad. i am in tears here at what happened to that innocent animal.
EAS (Unverified)
I think the law has to be very careful to disciminate between actual cruelty and what someone who is not the pet guardian considers neglect. In this case the man was wrong to have the dog in the back of the truck but it's not actually illegal, just unwise. He didn't check on her being securely installed in the truck and when he found she was injured, he did take her somewhere but not to the vet. To leave his pet untreated when she was so horribly injured showed disregard for her welfare and cruelty, since she was mortally wounded and suffering. In other cases, people can simply allege mistreatment based on how they would have handled a situation and criminalize someone who is trying very hard to help their pet but stops at euthanization. That's a different circumstance.