Alleged Cat Killer on Trial in Virginia

Published March 14, 2012

Anthony Robert Ahrens is on trial for allegedly throwing his brown tabby cat (not pictured) into a kennel with three non-cat-friendly dogs.

Anthony Robert Ahrens is on trial for allegedly throwing his brown tabby cat into a kennel with three non-cat-friendly dogs.

On Tuesday, March 6, following a preliminary hearing, Judge J. Gregory Ashwell certified a felony charge of animal cruelty against 26-year-old Ahrens, an ex-executive chef.

According to the Rappahannock News, Ahrens is blamed for throwing his tabby cat into a dog kennel, last Christmas Eve, with his two Alaskan malamutes. Explaining his action, Ahrens told Judge Ashwell it was because his cat bit his finger.

Ahrens claims that after his cat, Blueridge, bit him, drawing blood, he became upset so he dropped the cat into the kennel where the dogs were kept. After he discovered the cat was dead he took the body out of the crate and put it in a firewood pile on his property.

Deputy Sheriff Ronnie Dodson testified that on Dec. 26 he was sent to a neighbor’s home. The neighbor, Cynthia Volk, said that the brown tabby had visited her often and had been living at her home for two weeks prior to Dec. 24.

She testified that Ahrens retrieved the cat and put him in a carrier with the help of her husband on the morning of December 24.

The sheriff also spoke with Ahren’s father, Leo Schiff. At the home, he saw two Alaskan malamutes inside the kennel and a third dog on a cable run in the yard. Schiff verified that his son threw the cat into the kennel on December 24, adding that he had retrieved the dead cat from the firewood pile.

Volk also said that on Christmas Day, Schiff phoned her to tell her Blueridge was dead, adding that Schiff had warned her not to return the cat to his son, "Because he would give it to the dogs." 

She notified police about the incident.

At the court hearing, Schiff denied Volk's statement and claimed that his son did not intentionally kill the cat. When questioned about what he saw, he said, "I just saw Tony trying to get the cat away from the dog. He loved the cat." Ahrens, who claims the cat slept with him, stated that “in his wildest dreams” he never thought his dog would attack the cat.

Frank Reynolds, Ahrens' attorney claimed that his client's actions did not deserve a felony charge of torturing a companion animal which resulted in Blueridge's death, since the actions were more negligent than belligerent, and moved to have the charges dismissed.  However these claims did not win over Judge Ashwell.

Following the testimony, Judge Ashwell said, "You plopped the cat over a six foot fence, and it was almost immediately attacked by a large wolf-like dog. I've got no problem certifying this charge to the Grand Jury.”

Naturally, we will have to wait for the results of the hearings, but until then,if you were on the jury would you consider this a case of animal cruelty or neglect and poor judgment? Tell us with a comment.

Author's profile photo
Jo Singer

Shortly after retiring as a social worker and psychotherapist, I discovered my "writer's voice"…

Leave a Comment

Enter your information below or log in to skip these fields.
No account? Sign up here.
* indicates a required field.
(will appear with your comment)
For privacy reasons, do not use your full name or email address.
(will not be published)
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted.

Your Privacy

Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.

Comments (28)

Anonymous (Unverified)
Put him in a kennel with a hungry wolf pack and see how he fares. He is the scum of the earth and should be given the same treatment he gave Blueridge. It is people like this that are wrong with the world. Blueridge should have clawed his eyes out. He was very aware of what he was doing and did it on purpose.
Yosemite Sam
This judge was 100% correct. People who abuse animals should be handed down maximum sentences and not just a slap on the wrist. If they purposely abuse a helpless animal, they will just as easily harm a human being. They are dangerous individuals.
Anonymous (Unverified)
Your dam right he needs to be charged as the judge set. He knew what he was doing, I guess it would be ok to throw him in with a Big Cat for his punishment.. I would even lock the door.. Poppa Smurf
Anonymous (Unverified)
This is one sick person. He should spend his days in prison. Better yet, throw him in with some of the finer folks in that prison, and let's see how he fares!
Anonymous (Unverified)
I'd like to throw him in with a couple of vicious animals or thugs. Anyone that does to any animal is more than capable of taking it out on people later. My heart goes out to the cat and I didn't blame the cat for biting him at all. That should of clawed his eyes out and then ran away from home and find himself a better one.
Anonymous (Unverified)
I definitely would consider this a case of animal cruelty. This person knew exactly what he was doing when he tossed the cat over the fence. Kudos to the judge for considering this a felony. We should have more judges like this one
LHPD (Unverified)
You bet I would charge him with animal cruelty! And who knows what kind of treatment he was giving the cat in reality...One of my two cats bites. You pet her and when she has enough, she bites; that's the way she is. I would not throw her into a cage with dogs who hate cats because she bites me! Sick guy! Another one!